Two-Year Clinical Comparison of Three Different Restorative Materials in Class II Cavities

• Register: TCTR
• Last refreshed on: 29 April 2024
• Main ID: TCTR20190405001
• Date of registration: 05/04/2019
• Prospective Registration: No
• Primary sponsor: Erciyes University Scientific Research Projects Foundation
• Public title: Two-Year Clinical Comparison of Three Different Restorative Materials in Class II Cavities
• Scientific title: Two-Year Clinical Comparison of Three Different Restorative Materials in Class II Cavities
• Date of first enrolment: 01/11/2016
• Recruitment status: Completed
• URL: https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20190405001
• Study type: Interventional
• Study design: Randomized
• Phase: N/A

Countries of recruitment

Türkiye

Contacts

• Name: Hacer Balkaya
• Affiliation: Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University

• Name: Hacer Balkaya
• Affiliation: Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University,

Key inclusion & exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) the patient has no systemic disease 2) the patient should be over 18 years of age; 3) the patient should have good periodontal status; 4) teeth to be restored should be vital; 5) teeth to be restored should have proximal contacts on both mesial and distal surfaces and be in occlusion with the antagonist teeth 6) teeth that have class II caries lesions in external and middle 1/3 of dentine thickness as determined radiographically
Exclusion criteria: 1) the existence of xerostomia and bruxism; 2) absence of adjacent and antagonist teeth; 3) extremely poor oral hygiene, severe or chronic periodontitis; 4) pregnant or lactating women; 5) teeth that have any restoration, endodontic treatment, periodontal and periapical pathology 6) the patients who are undergoing orthodontic treatment.

Age minimum: 20 Years
Age maximum: 32 Years
Gender: Both

Health Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied

Healthy persons between the age group of 20 and 32 years.

Intervention(s)

conventional composite resin,buklfill composite resin,high viscosity glass ionomer

Charisma Smart Composite group: Single Bond Universal adhesive (3M ESPE, Neuss, Germany) was applied to the cavities according to the manufacturer’s instructions and polymerized with an LED light device (Valo, 1000 mW / cm2, Ultradent, Utah, USA) for 10 s. Charisma Smart Composite (CSC) was placed incrementally by using horizontal increments, not exceeding 2 mm in the cavity, and each layer was cured for 20 s. After removal of the matrix and wedges, the restorations were additionally cured for 10 s from the buccal and palatal/lingual sides.,Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative group: Single Bond Universal adhesive was applied and polymerized as in Group 1. Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative (FBF) was placed in bulk into the cavity, but at no more than 4 mm thick, and was cured for 20 s. After removal of the matrix and wedges, the restorations were additionally cured for 10 s from the buccal and palatal/lingual sides.,Equia Forte Fil group: Cavity Conditioner (GC) was applied to the cavities for 10 s, washed, and gently dried. After isolation, an Equia Forte Fil (EF) capsule was placed in an automatic mixer and stirred for 10 s. The capsule was then placed in a special applicator and injected into the cavities. After the manufacturer’s recommended setting time of 2.5 minutes, the restoration was finished, polished and gently dried. Equia Forte Coat (GC) was applied to the restoration surfaces and cured for 20 s.

Experimental Other,Experimental Other,Experimental Other

Primary Outcome(s)

Clinical evaluation 2 year USPHS criteria

Secondary Outcome(s)

Radiographic evaluation 2 year bite-wing radiographies

Source(s) of Monetary Support

Erciyes University Scientific Research Projects Foundation

Results

• Date Completed: 01/12/2018