World Health Organization site
Skip Navigation Links

Main
Note: This record shows only 22 elements of the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. To view changes that have been made to the source record, or for additional information about this trial, click on the URL below to go to the source record in the primary register.
Register: REBEC
Last refreshed on: 29 May 2023
Main ID:  RBR-9z6hx2
Date of registration: 06/06/2018
Prospective Registration: No
Primary sponsor: Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia - Universidade Estadual Paulista
Public title: Clinical Assessment of Caries Restorations in the posterior tooth with bulk-fill resin
Scientific title: Longitudinal Clinical Assessment of Class II Cavity Restorations Using Bulk-Fill Technique: A Randomized Clinical Study
Date of first enrolment: 01/12/2014
Target sample size:
Recruitment status: Data analysis completed
URL:  http://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-9z6hx2
Study type:  Intervention
Study design:  Clinical trial of Treatment, randomized, controlled, parallel, double-blind, two arms  
Phase:  N/A
Countries of recruitment
Brazil
Contacts
Name: Taciana Marco Ferraz   Caneppele
Address:  Avenida José Longo, 777 12245-000 São José dos Campos Brazil
Telephone: +55-012-39479304
Email: taciana@ict.unesp.br
Affiliation:  Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia - Universidade Estadual Paulista
Name: Taciana Marco Ferraz   Caneppele
Address:  Avenida Francisco José Longo, 777 12245--00 São José dos Campos Brazil
Telephone: +55-012-39479304
Email: taciana@ict.unesp.br
Affiliation:  Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia - Universidade Estadual Paulista
Key inclusion & exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Necessity of two Class II restorations with composite resin for decayed teeth or the necessity of changing the restoration; teeth which can be fully isolated; presence of antagonist and adjacent tooth; and teeth with vital pulp; no pain; direct pulp capping and no history of hypersensitivity
Exclusion criteria: Very extensive caries lesion; pulp exposure during caries removal or cavities with a high risk of exposure; allergies to the materials to be used


Age minimum: 18Y
Age maximum: 60Y
Gender: -
Health Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied
Dental Caries; Dental Leakage; Dental Restoration Wear; Dental Restoration Failure
C07.793.221
E06.323.400
C07.793.720.210
E06.780.346.737.125
Intervention(s)
D25.339
Procedure/surgery
The restoration procedures were performed by three calibrated operators. Firstly, inter-proximal radiographic examination was performed. The cavity depth was ranked after complete removal of the failed restoration or carious lesion and then the tooth was fully isolated. In those cases of deep lesions, glass-ionomer cement was used in the pulp wall. Enamel and dentin were etched with 37% phosphoric acid gel for 30 and 15 seconds, respectively. An adhesive system (Single Bond Adper – 3M ESPE) was used according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Sectional matrices (Unimatrix System, TDV, Pomerode, SC, Brazil) were used for restoration in association with distancing ring and wooden wedge.
Each patient received two restorations, according to the randomization process performed by a specific software (www.sealedenvelop.com): 1)Intervention: Thirty-five restorations with bulk-fill resin SDR (Smart Dentine Replacement, Dentsply), in which the resin is slowly applied at the deepest point of the cavity, letting the tip of the applicator immersed until reaching 4 mm inside the cavity and then light cured for 20 seconds (power density of 900mW/cm2), with the final 2-mm of the cavity being filled with Z350 resin (3M ESPE) and light cured for 20 seconds; 2)Control: Thirty-five restorations with conventional resin Z350 (3M ESPE) was performed using the incremental technique, with each increment being light cured for 20 seconds. Materials, manufacturers and compositions are listed in Table 1. After seven days, the restorations were adjusted when needed and polished
E06.323.428
Primary Outcome(s)
Retention failure of composite restorations will be evaluated by clinical assessment (visual inspection), considering a variation of at least 5% in the measurements after polishing, 6, 12 and 24 months
The presence of the fracture of the restoration will be evaluated by clinical assessment (visual inspection), considering a variation of at least 5% in the measurements after polishing, 6, 12 and 24 months
Secondary Outcome(s)
The presence of the Marginal discoloration of the restoration will be evaluated by clinical assessment (visual inspection), considering a variation of at least 5% in the measurements after polishing, 6, 12 and 24 months
The presence of the recurrence caries will be evaluated by clinical assessment (visual inspection), considering a variation of at least 5% in the measurements after polishing, 6, 12 and 24 months
Secondary ID(s)
Source(s) of Monetary Support
Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia - Universidade Estadual Paulista
Secondary Sponsor(s)
Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia - Universidade Estadual Paulista
Ethics review
Results
Results available:
Date Posted:
Date Completed:
URL:
Disclaimer: Trials posted on this search portal are not endorsed by WHO, but are provided as a service to our users. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for any damages arising from the use of the information linked to in this section. None of the information obtained through use of the search portal should in any way be used in clinical care without consulting a physician or licensed health professional. WHO is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness and/or use made of the content displayed for any trial record.
Copyright - World Health Organization - Version 3.6 - Version history