Drug compliance among hypertensive patients in Kassala, Eastern Sudan
AbstractA cross-sectional study of hypertensive patients was conducted and drug compliance was estimated. Factors associated with compliance, status of blood pressure control and occurrence of complications were assessed. Compliance was 59.6% as measured with the pill count method. We found 92% of compliant patients had controlled blood pressure in comparison with 18% of non-compliant patients, and 30.1% of the compliant patients had complications in comparison with 46.3% of the non-compliant patients. While the compliance rate was reasonable, 36.8% of patients were non-compliant because they could not afford to buy antihypertensive drugs. Inability to buy drugs was negatively and significantly associated with compliance. These patients experienced uncontrolled blood pressure and other complications
El Zubier, A.G. (2000). Drug compliance among hypertensive patients in Kassala, Eastern Sudan. EMHJ - Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 6 (1), 100-105, 2000 http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/118841
JournalEMHJ - Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 6 (1), 100-105, 2000
MetadataShow full item record
Showing items related by title and MeSH subject.
2003 [Two thousand and three] World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) guidelines statement on management of hypertension / World Health Organization, International Society pf Hypertension Writing Group World Health Organization; International Society of Hypertension (2003)
Risk of hypertension in Yozgat province, central Anatolia: application of framingham hypertension prediction risk score Kilic, M.; Ede, H.; Kilic, A.I. (2016-04)The aim of this cross-sectional study was to estimate the risk of hypertension in 1106 Caucasian individuals aged 20-69 years in Yozgat Province, using the Framingham Hypertension Risk Prediction Score [FHRPS]. According to FHRPS, average risk of developing hypertension over 4 years was 6.2%. The participants were classified into low- [<5%], moderate- [5% to 10%] and high- [>10%] risk groups. The percentage of participants that fell into these groups was 59.4%, 19.8% and 20.8% respectively. The proportion of participants in the high-risk group ...