World Health Organization site
Skip Navigation Links

Main
Note: This record shows only the 20 elements of the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. To view changes that have been made to the source record, or for additional information about this trial, click on the URL below to go to the source record in the primary register.
Register: PACTR
Last refreshed on: 29 April 2013
Main ID:  PACTR201301000458308
Date of registration: 19/11/2012
Primary sponsor: Alcohol and Drug Abuse Research Unit
Public title: The effectiveness of a substance use and substance-related HIV prevention programme
Scientific title: The effectiveness of an evidence-based workplace substance abuse and substance related HIV-related prevention programme within a service industry in Cape Town, South Africa.
Date of first enrolment: 2011-10-03
Target sample size: 325
Recruitment status: Completed: recruitment & data analysis complete
URL:  HTTP://www.pactr.org/ATMWeb/appmanager/atm/atmregistry?da=true&tno=PACTR201301000458308
Study type:  interventional
Study design:  Factorial: participants randomly allocated to either no,one,some or all interventions simultaneously,
Randomised,
For the one division we used a simple randomisation using a table created by a computer software programme; and for the 2nd division we used coin tossing ,
Allocation was determined jointly determined by the reseacher and statistician,
 
Countries of recruitment
South Africa
Contacts
Name: nadine   harker burnhams
Address:  Francie van zyl drive cape town South Africa
Telephone: 0836414543
Email: nadine.harker.burnhams@mrc.ac.za
Affiliation:  Senior Scientist
Name: Nadine  Harker Burnhams
Address:  Francie van zyl drive Cape Town South Africa
Telephone: 0836414543
Email: nadine.harker.burnhams@mrc.ac.za
Affiliation:  Senior Scientist
Key inclusion & exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Company and divisions were selected along the following criteria:
1. The company should have a workforce between 200-300 employees.
2. The company should be located within the Western Cape.
3. The company should have an on/off site Employee Assistance/Wellness Programme (EAP/EWP) and should be open to participating in the intervention study.
4. The company and its employees should be conversant in English as the intervention will be conducted in English although the questionnaire will be translated into the vernacular.
5. There should be stability in the workforce, in other words a 75% or more retention over a one year period. This is to ensure the likelihood that all employees who participate in initial data collection will be there for follow-up.
6. The company should have a formalized substance abuse and HIV/AIDS policy.
7. The project should be endorsed by Management, Human Resources and the trade unions.

Exclusion criteria: None

Age minimum: 18 Year
Age maximum: 70 Year
Gender: Both
Health Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied

Substance abuse
Intervention(s)
Primary Outcome(s)
Participation in Team awareness is associated with a positive change in team drinking climate from
Participation in team awareness will be positively associated with a reduction in last 6 months call in sick episodes because of hangover from
Participation in team awareness will be positively associated with a reduction in last 6 months going to work with a hangover from
Participation in Team awareness will be positively associated with a reduction in negative stigma perceptions from
Participation in team awareness will be positively associated with improved responsiveness in encouraging and reporting substance use problems
Participation in team awareness will be positively associated with reduced tolerance of co-worker AOD use from .
We hypothesise a positive change in employee perception of their substance use policy in respect of i) fairness and ii) effectiveness from
We hypothesise that group cohesion amongst employees will have increased from
We hypothesise that individual employee experience of group stress will decrease from
We hypothesise that team awareness will have reduced past 30 day risky alcohol use (? 5 drinks on one occasion) amongst the employees studied from Time1 ? Time 2 ? Time 3.
We hypothesise that willingness to use EAP for a personal or work-related problem would have improved from
Secondary Outcome(s)
Secondary ID(s)
REC433/2008
Source(s) of Monetary Support
MRC Research Capacity Development
ADDRF
Secondary Sponsor(s)
Disclaimer: Trials posted on this search portal are not endorsed by WHO, but are provided as a service to our users. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for any damages arising from the use of the information linked to in this section. None of the information obtained through use of the search portal should in any way be used in clinical care without consulting a physician or licensed health professional. WHO is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness and/or use made of the content displayed for any trial record.
Copyright - World Health Organization - Version 3.1 - Version history