World Health Organization site
Skip Navigation Links

Main
Note: This record shows only the 20 elements of the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. To view changes that have been made to the source record, or for additional information about this trial, click on the URL below to go to the source record in the primary register.
Register: Netherlands Trial Register
Last refreshed on: 28 April 2013
Main ID:  NTR3136
Date of registration: 10/11/2011
Primary sponsor: Stichting Instituut GAK (SIG)
Public title: Cost-effectiveness Analysis of a Sustainable Employability Intervention.
Scientific title: Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Sustainable Employability: A Dutch quasi experiment in Care for Companies/Second Care. - CASE
Date of first enrolment: 20/11/2011
Target sample size: 140
Recruitment status: recruiting
URL:  http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=3136
Study type:  intervention
Study design:  Randomised: No; Masking: None; Control: Active; Group: Parallel; Type: 2 or more arms, non-randomized  
Countries of recruitment
The Netherlands
Contacts
Name: C.Y.G.  Noben
Address:  P.O. Box 616 6200 MD, Department of Health Services Research - focusing on Chronic Care and Ageing - Duboisdomein 30 Room 0.044 6229 GT Maastricht The Netherlands
Telephone: +31 (0)43 3881834
Email: c.noben@maastrichtuniversity.nl
Affiliation: 
Name: C.Y.G.  Noben
Address:  P.O. Box 616 6200 MD, Department of Health Services Research - focusing on Chronic Care and Ageing - Duboisdomein 30 Room 0.044 6229 GT Maastricht The Netherlands
Telephone: +31 (0)43 3881834
Email: c.noben@maastrichtuniversity.nl
Affiliation: 
Key inclusion & exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. Diagnosed with physical complaints;

2. Aged between 18 and 63;

3. Perform paid labor for at least 12 hours per week;

4. Ability to communicate in Dutch.

Exclusion criteria: 1. Absenteeism for 1.5 years or longer;

2. Fulltime students with a student job;

3. Fulltime informal caregivers;

4. Fulltime volunteers.


Age minimum:
Age maximum:
Gender:
Health Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied
Mental health complaints, Cost-effectiveness , Economic evaluation, Work disability, Physical complaints, Sustainable employability

Intervention(s)
The intervention starts with a multidisciplinary expertise. Hereby, spread over 1 or 2 days, depending on the needs of the patient, the physiotherapist (both surgery and training hall), occupational therapist, Cesar remedial therapist, psychologist and physician examine the patient. Everyone does this expertise based from their own qualities (with bio-psychosocial glasses). Based on the complaints, activities and environment a patient copes with, a modular design for each client is examined. The multidisciplinary team discusses an overall report in which history, research, conclusions, shared goals and treatment plans with sub-targets are formulated. (Which treatment components are necessary and useful?)
Besides the expert report, a plan for a treatment process will be offered to the client as well. Only after approval of this proposal, the treatment (intervention) will be started.

Overall, three distinct types of trajectories (interventions) can be provided:

1. ?Psychological Journey?: The nature of the complaints and the insertion of the support / treatment is a psychic. Psychological training consists roughly of a psychology module, an occupational therapy module, relaxation and a module coordination of the process. Furthermore, during the reporting process, evaluation points with the client, a three-way conversation at work (or visit), discussions within the multidisciplinary team, etc. will take place;

2. ?Physical Journey?: The nature of the complaints and the insertion of the support / treatment is a very physical. A physical process broadly consists of a module physiotherapy, a rehabilitation module, a module Posture and movement (exercise Cesar) and the coordination of the process. (See above). Sometimes the occupational therapy module is used to apply the lessons learned in everyday life and balancing of the load of interpretation;

3. ?Multidisciplinary Track?: The nature of the complaints and / or the insertion of the counse
Primary Outcome(s)
1. A difference of 20% in the average no. of hours/days lost from work due to work disability between the intervention and the control group at 6, 12, and 18 months;

2. Cost per productivity lost reduction at 6, 12, and 18 months;

3. Cost per QALY at 6, 12, and 18 months.
Secondary Outcome(s)
1. Hours lost from work due to presenteeism;

2. Quality of life;

3. General health;

4. Costs and productivity losses;

5. Medical care consumption.
Secondary ID(s)
ECP107
Source(s) of Monetary Support
Stichting Instituut GAK (SIG), Maastricht University, Care for Companies/Second Care, Nederland
Secondary Sponsor(s)
Disclaimer: Trials posted on this search portal are not endorsed by WHO, but are provided as a service to our users. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for any damages arising from the use of the information linked to in this section. None of the information obtained through use of the search portal should in any way be used in clinical care without consulting a physician or licensed health professional. WHO is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness and/or use made of the content displayed for any trial record.
Copyright - World Health Organization - Version 3.1 - Version history