World Health Organization site
Skip Navigation Links

Main
Note: This record shows only the 20 elements of the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. To view changes that have been made to the source record, or for additional information about this trial, click on the URL below to go to the source record in the primary register.
Register: ClinicalTrials.gov
Last refreshed on: 17 October 2012
Main ID:  NCT00275769
Date of registration: 11/01/2006
Primary sponsor: Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm Disease Management
Public title: CAPTURE - Complete Automatic Pacing Threshold Utilization Recorded by EnPulse
Scientific title: Complete Automatic Pacing Threshold Utilization Recorded by EnPulse
Date of first enrolment: March 2004
Target sample size: 860
Recruitment status: Completed
URL:  http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00275769
Study type:  Interventional
Study design:  Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Factorial Assignment, Masking: Open Label  
Countries of recruitment
Canada United States
Contacts
Name:   Raymond Gendreau, MD
Address: 
Telephone:
Email:
Affiliation:  Cite di la Sante de Laval
Name:   Stephen W. Mester, MD
Address: 
Telephone:
Email:
Affiliation:  Tampa General Hospital
Name:   Lawrence S. Rosenthal, MD
Address: 
Telephone:
Email:
Affiliation:  UMass Memorial Medical Center
Key inclusion & exclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients that meet ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 class I or II dual chamber pacing indications
(intended for a Pacing Mode programmed to DDD or DDDR)

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patient with mechanical tricuspid heart valves

- Patients with medical conditions that preclude the testing required by the protocol
or limit study participation



Age minimum: N/A
Age maximum: N/A
Gender: Both
Health Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied
Arrhythmia
Bradycardia
Intervention(s)
Device: Pacemaker
Primary Outcome(s)
The automatic device features Atrial Capture Management and Ventricular Capture Management measure pacing thresholds and is compared to manual pacing thresholds observed at the 6 month follow-up visit
Secondary Outcome(s)
Observe the effects of Post Mode Switch Overdrive Pacing (PMOP) on AT/AF burden.
Observe the variability of multiple pacing thresholds measured with ACM and VCM
Observe visit time differences using automatic measurements versus traditional follow-up
Secondary ID(s)
229
Source(s) of Monetary Support
Please refer to primary and secondary sponsors
Secondary Sponsor(s)
Medtronic
Disclaimer: Trials posted on this search portal are not endorsed by WHO, but are provided as a service to our users. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for any damages arising from the use of the information linked to in this section. None of the information obtained through use of the search portal should in any way be used in clinical care without consulting a physician or licensed health professional. WHO is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness and/or use made of the content displayed for any trial record.
Copyright - World Health Organization - Version 3.1 - Version history