|
Main
|
|
Note: This record shows only the 20 elements of the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. To view changes that have been made to the source record, or for additional information about this trial, click on the URL below to go to the source record in the primary register. |
|
Register:
|
ISRCTN |
|
Last refreshed on:
|
12 February 2013 |
|
Main ID: |
ISRCTN19875148 |
|
Date of registration:
|
16/02/2012 |
|
Primary sponsor: |
|
|
Public title:
|
An effectiveness evaluation of the Embrace Infant Warmer
N/A |
|
Scientific title:
|
An effectiveness evaluation of the Embrace Infant Warmer: observational study of demand and effectiveness. |
|
Date of first enrolment:
|
Mar 1 2012 |
|
Target sample size:
|
2550 neonates |
|
Recruitment status: |
Completed/Not recruiting |
|
URL:
|
http://isrctn.org/ISRCTN19875148 |
|
Study type:
|
Observational |
|
Study design:
|
Observational non-randomised trial
|
|
|
Countries of recruitment
|
|
India
| | | | | | | |
|
Contacts
|
|
Name:
|
Grant
Miller |
|
Address:
|
Stanford University
117 Encina Commons
CA 94305 2004
Stanford
United States of America |
|
Telephone:
|
|
|
Email:
|
|
|
Affiliation:
|
|
| | |
|
Key inclusion & exclusion criteria
|
Inclusion criteria: 1. Mothers who have given birth to children in Karnataka, India
2. Health providers in rural Karnataka
Exclusion criteria: Does not meet inclusion criteria
Age minimum:
Age maximum:
Gender:
|
|
Health Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied
|
|
Marternal and child health
|
|
Intervention(s)
|
|
We will evaluate association between price and adoption decisions as well as any subsequent associations with health outcomes and medical expenditures of the Embrace Infant Warmer in rural Karnataka, India.
|
|
Primary Outcome(s)
|
1. Diffusion of the Embrace warmer through professional/social networks
2. Responsiveness of patient demand to improvements in clinical quality
3. Responsiveness of provider effort to improvements in medical technology
4. Changes in Newborn Warmth Practices in response to the warmer
5. Price responsiveness among maternity care providers
|
|
Secondary Outcome(s)
|
|
No secondary outcome measures
|
|
Source(s) of Monetary Support
|
|
1. Peery Foundation, California (USA)
2. Freeman Spogli Institute, Stanford University, California (USA)
3. Duke University, North Carolina (USA)
|
|