World Health Organization site
Skip Navigation Links

Main
Note: This record shows only 22 elements of the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. To view changes that have been made to the source record, or for additional information about this trial, click on the URL below to go to the source record in the primary register.
Register: ISRCTN
Last refreshed on: 13 January 2015
Main ID:  ISRCTN80882762
Date of registration: 06/02/2007
Prospective Registration: No
Primary sponsor: South Asian Clinical Toxicology Research Collaboration (SACTRC) (Sri Lanka)
Public title: Fructose-1,6-diphosphate (FDP) in yellow oleander poisoning
Scientific title: Phase II randomised controlled trial of fructose-1,6-diphosphate (FDP) in yellow oleander poisoning
Date of first enrolment: 01/06/2006
Target sample size: 32
Recruitment status: Completed
URL:  http://isrctn.com/ISRCTN80882762
Study type:  Interventional
Study design:  Placebo controlled, randomised phase II study (Treatment)  
Phase: 
Countries of recruitment
Sri Lanka
Contacts
Name:    
Address: 
Telephone:
Email:
Affiliation: 
Name: Andrew    Dawson
Address:  South Asian Clinical Toxicology Research Collaboration (SACTRC) Department of Medicine University of Peradeniya 20000 Peradeniya Sri Lanka
Telephone: +94 (0)81 4479822
Email: adawson@sactrc.org
Affiliation: 
Key inclusion & exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Patients (16 years of age and older, male or female) with significant cardiotoxicity will be recruited to this study, i.e. those with: 3° heart block, Mobitz type II 2° block, atrial tachyarrhythmias, sinus bradycardia with heart rate less than 35 bpm, or sinus arrest or block with sinus pauses more than 3 seconds.
Exclusion criteria: 1. No consent
2. Pregnant
3. Less than 16 years of age
4. Ingested other cardioactive substances in addition to oleander
5. Other major medical conditions (e.g. cardiovascular disease renal or hepatic failure)


Age minimum:
Age maximum:
Gender: Both
Health Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied
Yellow oleander-induced cardiac toxicity
Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning
Cardiac toxicity
Intervention(s)
A blood sample will be taken on all randomised patients at the start and end of the infusion and 30 minutes, four and 12 hours later and then at daily intervals. Serum potassium, magnesium, calcium, as well as renal function and liver function will be measured (routine clinical biochemistry methodology). The cardiac glycoside and FDP concentration will also be measured at these times.

Four dose levels of FDP will be studied with the dose doubled if the results in the preceding eight patients do not indicate any concerning dose-related adverse effects. Two patients will receive a placebo and six patients will receive active treatment at each dose level.

Doses:
The first dose will be 30 mg/kg, 60% of the dose shown to be effective for this indication in dogs (50 mg/kg Intravenous [IV]). The dose will be doubled (60 mg/kg, 125 mg/kg) until 250 mg/kg assuming there is no significant toxicity attributed to the preparation at the previous dose. All these doses are well within the range of doses used in previous human studies. The highest dose is chosen as it was the most effective IV dose in one human study of ischemia/reperfusion injury post cardiac surgery (although FDP was also used in the cardioplegia solution), and larger doses (three doses of 250 mg/kg) seemed no more effective in this study and a non-significantly higher rate of acidosis and atrial fibrillation was also observed. Doses will be diluted in 5% dextrose and infused over 30 minutes with infusion pumps. Placebo infusions will be an equal volume of 5% dextrose. Drugs will be prepared shortly before use by a registered pharmacist. Treating doctors will be blind to treatment allocation.
Primary Outcome(s)
The primary outcome will be the time to revert to continuous sinus rhythm with rate more than 44/min, in those receiving FDP versus the placebo group.
Secondary Outcome(s)
1. The number of patients with sinus rhythm with rate more than 44 bpm at two hours
2. Number of patients administered DigiFab
3. Other adverse events
4. Death

Secondary analysis will also compare the results at each dosing level as well as comparing trends with dose. Adverse events reported by doctors will be rated by them as to the likelihood of them being due to FDP infusion (certain, probable, possible, unlikely).
Secondary ID(s)
071669; sactrc0305
Source(s) of Monetary Support
International collaborative research grant:, The Wellcome Trust (UK) (grant ref: 071669), The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia (Australia)
Secondary Sponsor(s)
Ethics review
Results
Results available:
Date Posted:
Date Completed:
URL:
Disclaimer: Trials posted on this search portal are not endorsed by WHO, but are provided as a service to our users. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for any damages arising from the use of the information linked to in this section. None of the information obtained through use of the search portal should in any way be used in clinical care without consulting a physician or licensed health professional. WHO is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness and/or use made of the content displayed for any trial record.
Copyright - World Health Organization - Version 3.6 - Version history