Main
|
Note: This record shows only 22 elements of the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. To view changes that have been made to the source record, or for additional information about this trial, click on the URL below to go to the source record in the primary register. |
Register:
|
ISRCTN |
Last refreshed on:
|
25 November 2019 |
Main ID: |
ISRCTN78372534 |
Date of registration:
|
23/01/2004 |
Prospective Registration:
|
No |
Primary sponsor: |
|
Public title:
|
Should general practitioners manage chronic fatigue syndrome? A controlled trial
|
Scientific title:
|
Should general practitioners manage chronic fatigue syndrome? A controlled trial |
Date of first enrolment:
|
01/04/1995 |
Target sample size:
|
0 |
Recruitment status: |
Completed |
URL:
|
http://isrctn.com/ISRCTN78372534 |
Study type:
|
Interventional |
Study design:
|
Randomised controlled trial (Other)
|
Phase:
|
Not Applicable
|
|
Countries of recruitment
|
United Kingdom
| | | | | | | |
Contacts
|
Name:
|
Peter
Campion |
Address:
|
Department of Public Health and Primary Care
University of Hull
College House
East Riding Campus
HU10 6NS
Willerby
United Kingdom |
Telephone:
|
- |
Email:
|
abc@email.com |
Affiliation:
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Address:
|
|
Telephone:
|
|
Email:
|
|
Affiliation:
|
|
| |
Key inclusion & exclusion criteria
|
Inclusion criteria: General Practices willing to take part.
Exclusion criteria: Does not meet inclusion criteria
Age minimum:
Age maximum:
Gender:
Not Specified
|
Health Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied
|
Other symptoms and general pathology Signs and Symptoms
|
Intervention(s)
|
The intervention we attempted to introduce was a form of brief behavioural therapy, offered to GPs as a management package. Control practices were invited to manage their patients as usual, which in many cases included referral to secondary care.
|
Primary Outcome(s)
|
The study suffered from both poor recruitment and high drop out. However, we were able to show that this intervention had no effect on the illness of the patients enrolled, and that patients with CFS remained highly disabled over the 12 month study period, whatever their treatment. The study suggests that general practitioners can diagnose CFS, but under the conditions of this study were unable to effectively treat the condition. This accords with the recent Royal Colleges' report, that early recognition in primary care is important, but that the only evidence for effective treatment thus far has come from specialist units. General practitioners do not yet generally have the skills nor the time to provide effective treatment programmes for CFS.
|
Secondary Outcome(s)
|
Not provided at time of registration
|
Source(s) of Monetary Support
|
NHS Primary and Secondary Care Interface National Research and Development Programme (UK)
|
Ethics review
|
Status:
Approval date:
Contact:
Not provided at time of registration
|
Results
|
Results available:
|
Yes |
Date Posted:
|
|
Date Completed:
|
01/02/1998 |
URL:
|
|
|
|