Main
|
Note: This record shows only 22 elements of the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. To view changes that have been made to the source record, or for additional information about this trial, click on the URL below to go to the source record in the primary register. |
Register:
|
EUCTR |
Last refreshed on:
|
21 July 2021 |
Main ID: |
EUCTR2013-002223-42-HU |
Date of registration:
|
12/01/2016 |
Prospective Registration:
|
Yes |
Primary sponsor: |
|
Public title:
|
A PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, MULTICENTER STUDY OF THE ANALGESIC EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF THE SUBCUTANEOUS ADMINISTRATION OF TANEZUMAB (PF-04383119) IN SUBJECTS WITH CANCER PAIN PREDOMINANTLY DUE TO BONE METASTASIS RECEIVING BACKGROUND OPIOID THERAPY
|
Scientific title:
|
A PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, MULTICENTER STUDY OF THE ANALGESIC EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF THE SUBCUTANEOUS ADMINISTRATION OF TANEZUMAB (PF-04383119) IN SUBJECTS WITH CANCER PAIN PREDOMINANTLY DUE TO BONE METASTASIS RECEIVING BACKGROUND OPIOID THERAPY |
Date of first enrolment:
|
04/04/2016 |
Target sample size:
|
176 |
Recruitment status: |
Not Recruiting |
URL:
|
https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=eudract_number:2013-002223-42 |
Study type:
|
Interventional clinical trial of medicinal product |
Study design:
|
Controlled: yes Randomised: yes Open: no Single blind: no Double blind: yes Parallel group: yes Cross over: no Other: no If controlled, specify comparator, Other Medicinial Product: no Placebo: yes Other: no Number of treatment arms in the trial: 2
|
Phase:
|
Human pharmacology (Phase I): no
Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II): no
Therapeutic confirmatory - (Phase III): yes
Therapeutic use (Phase IV): no
|
|
Countries of recruitment
|
Argentina
|
Australia
|
Austria
|
Brazil
|
Chile
|
Czech Republic
|
France
|
Germany
|
Hungary
|
Israel
|
Japan
|
Korea, Republic of
|
Poland
|
Romania
|
Slovakia
|
Spain
|
United Kingdom
| | | | | | | |
Contacts
|
Name:
|
ClinicalTrials.gov call Center
|
Address:
|
235 East 42nd Street
NY 10017
New York
United States |
Telephone:
|
+1800718 1021 |
Email:
|
clinicaltrials.govcallcenter@pfizer.com |
Affiliation:
|
Pfizer Inc |
|
Name:
|
ClinicalTrials.gov call Center
|
Address:
|
235 East 42nd Street
NY 10017
New York
United States |
Telephone:
|
+1800718 1021 |
Email:
|
clinicaltrials.govcallcenter@pfizer.com |
Affiliation:
|
Pfizer Inc |
| |
Key inclusion & exclusion criteria
|
Inclusion criteria: 1. Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the subject has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study. 2. Subject is willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests, and other study procedures. 3. Male or female, = 18 years of age. 4. Weight is = 40 kg at Screening. 5. Subject has cancer diagnosed as having metastasized to bone or has multiple myeloma. 6. Imaging confirmation of bone metastasis at Screening or within 120 days prior to the Screening visit according to local standard of care (eg, via bone scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) scan, or positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan). 7. Subject is expected to require daily opioid medication throughout the course of the study. 8. Subject willing to not use prohibited medications (including NSAIDs) throughout the duration of the study. 9. Average Pain Score =5 at Screening for the index bone metastasis cancer pain site. 10. Patient’s Global Assessment of Cancer Pain must be “fair”, “poor” or “very poor” at Screening. 11. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Score of 0, 1, or 2 at Screening. 12. Adequate bone marrow function at Screening as defined in the protocol. 13. Adequate renal function at Screening as defined in the protocol. 14. Adequate liver function at Screening as defined in the protocol. 15. Female subjects of childbearing potential and at risk for pregnancy must agree to use at least one highly effective method of contraception throughout the study and for 112 days (16 weeks) after the last dose of assigned subcutaneous study medication. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 130 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 46
Exclusion criteria: 1. The subject’s pain is related to an oncologic emergency. 2. The subject has brain metastasis or leptomeningeal metastasis. 3. The subject’s pain is primarily classified as neuropathic, visceral or unknown in nature, has resulted from prior cancer therapy, is due to infection or is otherwise not predominantly related to a bone metastasis. 4. Systemic treatment for the primary malignancy or bone metastasis, including chemotherapy, hormonal treatment (eg, gonadotropinreleasing hormone (GnRH) agonists or antagonists), bisphosphonates and denosumab started within 30 days of the first day of the Baseline Assessment Period. 5. Receipt of radiopharmaceutical treatment or radiotherapy for treatment of bone metastasis within 30 days of the first day of the Baseline Assessment Period. 6. Diagnosis of osteoarthritis of the knee or hip as defined by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) combined clinical and radiographic criteria. 7. Subjects with symptoms and radiographic findings consistent with osteoarthritis in the shoulder. 8. History or radiographic evidence of orthopedic conditions that may increase the risk of joint safety conditions during the study as defined in the protocol. 9. Signs and symptoms of clinically significant cardiac disease within 6 months of the study as defined in the protocol or subjects with any other cardiovascular illness that in the opinion of the investigator would render a subject unsuitable to participate in the study. 10. Subjects with orthostatic hypotension or evidence for an autonomic neuropathy at Screening as defined in the protocol. 11. History, diagnosis, or signs and symptoms of clinically significant neurological disease as described in the protocol. 12. Planned surgical procedure during the duration of the study 13. Subjects considered unfit for surgery as defined in the protocol.
For the rest of the exclusion criteria, please refer to the protocol
Age minimum:
Age maximum:
Gender:
Female: yes Male: yes
|
Health Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied
|
Metastatic Bone Pain MedDRA version: 20.0
Level: LLT
Classification code 10049038
Term: Metastatic bone pain
System Organ Class: 100000004864
|
Therapeutic area: Diseases [C] - Musculoskeletal Diseases [C05]
|
Intervention(s)
|
Product Name: Tanezumab Product Code: PF-04383119 Pharmaceutical Form: Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe INN or Proposed INN: Tanezumab CAS Number: 880266-57-9 Current Sponsor code: PF-04383119 Other descriptive name: RI624, RN624 Concentration unit: mg/ml milligram(s)/millilitre Concentration type: equal Concentration number: 10- Pharmaceutical form of the placebo: Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe Route of administration of the placebo: Subcutaneous use
Product Name: Tanezumab Product Code: PF-04383119 Pharmaceutical Form: Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe INN or Proposed INN: Tanezumab CAS Number: 880266-57-9 Current Sponsor code: PF-04383119 Other descriptive name: RI624, RN624 Concentration unit: mg/ml milligram(s)/millilitre Concentration type: equal Concentration number: 20- Pharmaceutical form of the placebo: Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe Route of administration of the placebo: Subcutaneous use
|
Primary Outcome(s)
|
Main Objective: -Demonstrate superior analgesic efficacy of tanezumab 20 mg SC versus matching placebo SC at Week 8 in subjects, with cancer pain predominantly due to bone metastasis, receiving background opioid therapy.
|
Secondary Objective: Evaluate the safety of tanezumab 20 mg SC versus matching placebo SC in subjects, with cancer pain predominantly due to bone metastasis, receiving background opioid therapy.
|
Primary end point(s): Change from Baseline to Week 8 in the daily average pain intensity in the index bone metastasis cancer pain site.
|
Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Please refer to the protocol
|
Secondary Outcome(s)
|
Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Please refer to the protocol
|
Secondary end point(s): Efficacy Measures: -Change from Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 16 and 24 in the daily average pain intensity NRS score in the index bone metastasis cancer pain site. -Change from Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 in the daily worst pain intensity NRS score in the index bone metastasis cancer pain site. -Change from Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 in the weekly average pain intensity NRS score in non-index cancer pain sites. -Change from Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 in the weekly worst pain intensity NRS score in non-index cancer pain sites. -Change from Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 in the daily average pain intensity NRS score in the non-index visceral cancer pain sites. -Change from Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 in the daily worst pain intensity NRS score in the non-index visceral cancer pain site. -Change from Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) average pain scores obtained at study visits. -Change from Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 in the BPI worst pain scores obtained at study visits. -Response as defined by a =30%, =50%, =70%, and = 90% reduction from Baseline in the daily average and daily worst pain intensity NRS score in the index bone metastasis cancer pain site at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24. -Change from Baseline in Patient’s Global Assessment of Cancer Pain at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24. -Response defined as an improvement of = 2 points in Patient's Global Assessment of Cancer Pain at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24. -Change from Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 in the BPI Pain Interference with Function Composite Score and individual pain interference item scores obtained at study visits. -EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L) dimensions and overall health utility score at Baseline and Weeks 8, 16 and 24.
Opioid Use and Opioid Adverse Effects Measures
-Average daily total opioid consumption (in mg of morphine equivalent doses) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24. -Average number of doses of rescue medication required per week at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24. -Change from Baseline in the weekly Opioid-Related Symptom Distress Scale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24.
Safety Measures
-Adverse events. -Standard safety assessments (safety laboratory testing [chemistry, hematology], sitting vital signs, ECG [12-lead]). -Orthostatic (supine/standing) blood pressure assessment. -Weight measurements. -Physical examinations. -Joint safety adjudication outcomes. -Total joint replacements. -Neurologic examination (Neuropathy Impairment Score [NIS]). -Survey of Autonomic Symptom scores. -Anti-drug antibody (ADA) assessments.
Refer to protocol for other endpoints
|
Secondary ID(s)
|
2013-002223-42-AT
|
A4091061
|
Source(s) of Monetary Support
|
Pfizer Inc, 235 East 42nd Street, New York, NY 10017
|
Ethics review
|
Status: Approved
Approval date: 07/03/2016
Contact:
|
Results
|
Results available:
|
|
Date Posted:
|
|
Date Completed:
|
|
URL:
|
|
|
|