World Health Organization site
Skip Navigation Links

Main
Note: This record shows only 22 elements of the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. To view changes that have been made to the source record, or for additional information about this trial, click on the URL below to go to the source record in the primary register.
Register: EUCTR
Last refreshed on: 24 April 2012
Main ID:  EUCTR2005-002161-36-IT
Date of registration: 31/01/2006
Prospective Registration: No
Primary sponsor: Sanofi-Synthelabo Groupe
Public title: RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF A TWO-MONTH REGIMEN OF IRBESARTAN VERSUS ENALAPRIL ON CARDIOVASCULAR MARKERS IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME WITHOUT ST SEGMENT ELEVATION. - ARCHIPELAGO
Scientific title: RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF A TWO-MONTH REGIMEN OF IRBESARTAN VERSUS ENALAPRIL ON CARDIOVASCULAR MARKERS IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME WITHOUT ST SEGMENT ELEVATION. - ARCHIPELAGO
Date of first enrolment: 24/01/2006
Target sample size: 440
Recruitment status: Not Recruiting
URL:  https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=eudract_number:2005-002161-36
Study type:  Interventional clinical trial of medicinal product
Study design:  Controlled: yes Randomised: yes Open: no Single blind: no Double blind: yes Parallel group: yes Cross over: no Other: yes Other trial design description: double dummy If controlled, specify comparator, Other Medicinial Product: yes Placebo: no Other: no  
Phase: 
Countries of recruitment
Germany Hungary Italy Spain United Kingdom
Contacts
Name:    
Address: 
Telephone:
Email:
Affiliation: 
Name:    
Address: 
Telephone:
Email:
Affiliation: 
Key inclusion & exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria:
Patients male or female 1 Age or to 18 years old 2 Patients hospitalized with ischemic symptoms last episode within the last 48 hours before randomization and at least one of the following characteristics of acute coronary syndrome without persistent ST segment elevation - ECG ST or T changes ST depression or transient elevation of at least 1mm or T wave changes in at least 2 leads - Positive troponin according to local threshold 3 Signed written informed consent obtained
Are the trial subjects under 18? no
Number of subjects for this age range:
F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes
F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range
F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes
F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria:
RELATED TO THE PATIENT. 1 Women of child bearing potential WCBP who are unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method to avoid pregnancy for the entire study period and for up to 4 weeks after the study WOCBP using a prohibited contraceptive method not applicable 2 Women pregnant or breast feeding 3 Women with a positive pregnancy test on enrolment or prior to study drug administration 4 Subjects with inability to follow protocol procedures according to the investigation. 5 Patients with dementia. 6 Patients unable to come back at all follow-up visits. RELATED TO THE DISEASE / CONCOMITAMT DISEASES. 7 Persistent ST segment elevation at ECG. 8 Systolic blood pressure 100mmHg. 9 Bilateral stenosis of renal artery. 10 Creatinine clearance or to 30 ml/mn based on admission serum creatinine value and the Cockcroft formula 11 Congestive hearth failure with symptoms consistent with New York Hearth Association NYHA class III or IV. 12 Aortic or mitral valve stenosis 13 Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 14 Connective tissue disease with vascular involvement 15 Angioplasty or surgery or trauma within the last 3 months. 16 Coronarography/angioplasty planned to be performed or performed before baseline sampling. 17 Febrile disease or to 38 C , known concomitant viral or bacterial infection, chronic auto immune disease, chronic inflammatory disease, known cancer in evolution. 18 Hyperkalemia serum potassium 5.5 mmol/l. 19 Life expentancy less than one year. RELATED TO STUDY DRUG/CONCOMITANT THERAPY. 20 Sensitivity or intolerance to ARBs olmesartan, candesartan, irbesartan, eprosartan, losartan, telmisartan, valsartan and/or any other ARB currently or previously in development . 21 Sensitivity or intolerance to ACE-I benazepril, captopril, enalapril, lisinopril, trendolapril, ramipril, quinapril, and/or any other ACE-I currently or previously in development. 22 Chronic steroid or non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs NSAIDs use. Aspirin is permitted. 23 Treatment with allopurinol or procainamide 24 Concomintant use of potassium sparing diuretics e.g. spironolactone, triamterene or amiloride , potassium preparations, or salt substitutes containing potassium 25 Treatment with lithium. 26 Immunosupressive medication. 27 Administration of any other investigational drug in the last 30 days before enrollment and during the course of the study. OTHER EXCLUSION CRITERIA. 28 Prisoners or subjects who are compulsorily detained involuntarily incarcerated for treatment or either a psychiatric or physical e.g., infectious disease illness must not be enrolled into this study.


Age minimum:
Age maximum:
Gender:
Female: yes
Male: yes
Health Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME
MedDRA version: 6.1 Level: PT Classification code 10051592
Intervention(s)

Trade Name: IRBESARTAN
Pharmaceutical Form: Tablet
INN or Proposed INN: Irbesartan
CAS Number: 138402-11-6
Concentration unit: mg milligram(s)
Concentration type: equal
Concentration number: 150-
Pharmaceutical form of the placebo: Tablet
Route of administration of the placebo: Oral use

Pharmaceutical Form: Tablet
INN or Proposed INN: Enalapril
CAS Number: 138402-11-6
Concentration unit: mg milligram(s)
Concentration type: equal
Concentration number: 10-
Pharmaceutical form of the placebo: Tablet
Route of administration of the placebo: Oral use

Primary Outcome(s)
Main Objective: THE MAIN OBJECTIVE OF THIS STUDY IS TO ASSESS IF A TWO-MONTH REGIMEN OF IRBESARTAN IN PATIENTS HOSPITALIZED FOR ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME WITHOUT ST SEGMENT ELEVATION CAN REDUCE INFLAMMATION MARKERS ie hsCRP ,IN COMPARISON TO ENALAPRIL
Primary end point(s): Primary efficacy outcome comparison of the relative change from baseline in hsCRP at day 60 between the two treatment groups.
Secondary Objective: TO COMPARE BOTH REGIMENS ON SEVERAL OTHER BIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS WHICH HAVE DEMONSTRATED THEIR RELEVANCE AND THEIR PREDICTIVE CLINICAL VALUE ie BNP, microalbuminuria,troponin I in this patient population. TO COMPARE ON THE ABOVE PARAMETERS THE EARLY INITIATION OF TREATMENT VERSUS THE INITIATION OF TREATMENT AT HOSPITAL DISCHARGE.
Secondary Outcome(s)
Secondary ID(s)
PM-C-0024
2005-002161-36-GB
Source(s) of Monetary Support
Secondary Sponsor(s)
Ethics review
Results
Results available:
Date Posted:
Date Completed:
URL:
Disclaimer: Trials posted on this search portal are not endorsed by WHO, but are provided as a service to our users. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for any damages arising from the use of the information linked to in this section. None of the information obtained through use of the search portal should in any way be used in clinical care without consulting a physician or licensed health professional. WHO is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness and/or use made of the content displayed for any trial record.
Copyright - World Health Organization - Version 3.6 - Version history