World Health Organization site
Skip Navigation Links

Main
Note: This record shows only 22 elements of the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. To view changes that have been made to the source record, or for additional information about this trial, click on the URL below to go to the source record in the primary register.
Register: EUCTR
Last refreshed on: 1 May 2012
Main ID:  EUCTR2004-005169-39-GB
Date of registration: 15/06/2005
Prospective Registration: Yes
Primary sponsor: AstraZeneca AB
Public title: A single-blind single arm study to validate the Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) for the diagnosis of reflux disease in primary care in patients treated with esomeprazole 40 mg o.d.
Scientific title: A single-blind single arm study to validate the Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) for the diagnosis of reflux disease in primary care in patients treated with esomeprazole 40 mg o.d.
Date of first enrolment: 26/10/2005
Target sample size: 350
Recruitment status: Not Recruiting
URL:  https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=eudract_number:2004-005169-39
Study type:  Interventional clinical trial of medicinal product
Study design:  Controlled: yes Randomised: no Open: no Single blind: yes Double blind: no Parallel group: no Cross over: no Other: yes Other trial design description: Single arm If controlled, specify comparator, Other Medicinial Product: no Placebo: yes Other: no  
Phase: 
Countries of recruitment
Denmark Germany Sweden United Kingdom
Contacts
Name:    
Address: 
Telephone:
Email:
Affiliation: 
Name:    
Address: 
Telephone:
Email:
Affiliation: 
Key inclusion & exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria:
For inclusion in the study, subjects must fulfil all of the following criteria:
1. Subjects must have provided informed consent in writing for the participation in this study
2. Subjects aged 18 to 79 years inclusive, male or female
3. Subjects who seek medical advice in primary care for symptoms thought by the PCP to arise from the upper GI tract (any of those symptoms listed in Table 3)
4. The symptoms thought to pertain to the upper GI tract must have been present for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 and to have occurred at least twice a week during that period
5. The symptoms thought to pertain to the upper GI tract must have been of at least mild severity for a minimum of 3 days during the week prior to Visit 1
6. Subjects judged to be capable to understand and to complete diaries and questionnaires reliably.

Are the trial subjects under 18? no
Number of subjects for this age range:
F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes
F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range
F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes
F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria:
Any of the following is regarded as a criterion for exclusion from the study:
1. Upper GI endoscopy performed within a year prior to Visit 1
2. Previous anti-reflux surgery, surgery for peptic ulcer or any form of upper gastrointestinal resective surgery
3. Contra-indication to the Bravo™ procedure such as subjects with a history of bleeding diathesis, strictures anywhere along the GI-tract, esophageal varices, obstructions, or subjects equipped with a pacemaker, an implantable cardiac defibrillator or an implantable neurostimulator (NB: subjects with LA Grade D confirmed by endoscopy at Visit 2 can continue the study without performing the Bravo™ procedure)
4. Any use of PPIs within 2 months prior to Visit 1, including those obtained OTC
5. Use of the following drug therapy within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1:
- Daily use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) at any dose greater than 165 mg
- Daily use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) including
COX-2 inhibitors at any dose
6. Presence of any alarm features, such as:
- Unintentional weight loss >3 kg in the previous 3 months
- Haematemesis, melaena or per-rectum blood loss in the previous year
- Progressive dysphagia
- Anaemia
- Any other symptom suggestive of malignancy
7. Any significant past or current disease or disorder (e.g.; cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, neurological, musculoskeletal, endocrine, malignant, or psychiatric), as revealed by history, physical examination or laboratory assessments, which, in the opinion of the investigator, may put the subject at risk, alter their performance or influence the subject’s ability to participate in the study
8. Unwillingness to undergo endoscopy, esophageal pH monitoring or to complete any other standard assessments used in the study
9. History of alcohol or drug abuse in the last two years or any condition associated with poor compliance, including expected non-cooperation, as judged by the investigator
10. Pregnancy or lactation. Women of childbearing potential must maintain effective contraception during the study period, as judged by the investigator
11. Treatment with phenytoin, warfarin (or other vitamin K antagonists), ketoconazole, itraconazole and cisapride
12. Planned donation of blood during the study period
13. Planned hospitalisation during the study period
14. Involvement in the planning and conduct of the study (applies to both AstraZeneca staff or staff at the study site)
15. Treatment with any medicinal investigational product within 90 days prior to Visit 1
16. Previous enrolment in the present study
17. Participation as a subject in any other medical research project during and in the 90 days prior to the start of the study
In addition to the above, the following criterion excludes the subject from participation into the study at Visit 2:
18. Any findings at endoscopy that make further participation in the study clinically inappropriate as judged by the investigator, such as suspected malignancy or evidence of clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding (i.e. visible vessel or other stigmata of current bleeding) [NB: Subjects with macroscopic Barrett’s esophagus (defined as subjects with endoscopic indications of any columnar lined epithelium in the esophagus) are not to be excluded; Subjects with LA Grade D confirmed by endoscopy at Visit 2 can continue the study without performing the Bravo™ procedure.].



Age minimum:
Age maximum:
Gender:
Female: yes
Male: yes
Health Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied
Symptoms from the upper gastrointestinal tract
Intervention(s)

Product Name: Esomeprazole, phase III capsule
Product Code: Esomeprazole, Gastro-Resistant Capsules
Pharmaceutical Form: Capsule, hard
INN or Proposed INN: Esomeprazole magnesium trihydrate
CAS Number: 217087-09-7
Concentration unit: mg milligram(s)
Concentration type: equal
Concentration number: 40-
Pharmaceutical form of the placebo: Capsule, hard
Route of administration of the placebo: Oral use

Primary Outcome(s)
Secondary Objective: 1. To estimate the sensitivity and specificity of the selection of RDQ items, endoscopy, esophageal pH monitoring, response to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and Symptom Association Probability (SAP) as diagnostic tests for GERD by using Latent Class Analysis (LCA) and Bayesian statistics
2. To estimate the prevalence of GERD with LCA and Bayesian statistics
3. To describe the study population at the initial and last visit with the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) dimensions in the whole study population and by GERD diagnosis
4. To estimate responsiveness of the RDQ during therapy in subjects categorised as having or not having GERD
Main Objective: The primary objective of this study is to determine the accuracy of the RDQ as a diagnostic test for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Symptom evaluation by the RDQ will be compared with other established approaches to the diagnosis of GERD in a primary care patient population with symptoms thought to be of upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract origin.
Primary end point(s): There are no primary end point in this study.

Based on the selection of RDQ items and the various methods of diagnosing
GERD, i.e. presence/absence of GERD as assessed by endoscopic Los Angeles (LA) grade, pH monitoring (% time with esophageal pH<4), SAP, outcome of PPI test, the primary variables are the cut-off level(s), sensitivity, specificity and predictive abilities of the RDQ score(s) (ROC curve and c-statistic), as assessed against each other diagnostic tool in use in this study
Secondary Outcome(s)
Secondary ID(s)
2004-005169-39-SE
D9914C00002
Source(s) of Monetary Support
Secondary Sponsor(s)
Ethics review
Results
Results available:
Date Posted:
Date Completed:
URL:
Disclaimer: Trials posted on this search portal are not endorsed by WHO, but are provided as a service to our users. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for any damages arising from the use of the information linked to in this section. None of the information obtained through use of the search portal should in any way be used in clinical care without consulting a physician or licensed health professional. WHO is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness and/or use made of the content displayed for any trial record.
Copyright - World Health Organization - Version 3.6 - Version history