World Health Organization site
Skip Navigation Links

Main
Note: This record shows only 22 elements of the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. To view changes that have been made to the source record, or for additional information about this trial, click on the URL below to go to the source record in the primary register.
Register: ANZCTR
Last refreshed on: 13 January 2020
Main ID:  ACTRN12605000439640
Date of registration: 20/09/2005
Prospective Registration: No
Primary sponsor: Urogynaecology unit Royal womens Hospital
Public title: Open versus Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial.
Scientific title: Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension for women with stress urinary incontinence: A prospective multicentre randomised single blind comparison of urodynamic cure of stress urinary incontinence at 6 months following surgery.
Date of first enrolment: 24/01/1997
Target sample size: 200
Recruitment status: Active, not recruiting
URL:  https://anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12605000439640.aspx
Study type:  Interventional
Study design:  Purpose: Treatment; Allocation: Randomised controlled trial; Masking: Blinded (masking used);Assignment: Other;Type of endpoint: Efficacy;  
Phase: 
Countries of recruitment
Australia
Contacts
Name: Dr Marcus Carey   
Address:  Suite D 10th Floor Francis Perry House 285 Cardigan Street Carlton VIC 3053 Australia
Telephone: +61 3 92215099
Email: marcus.carey@affinityhealth.com.au
Affiliation: 
Name: Ann Cornish   
Address:  Royal Womens Hospital 132 Grattan Street Carlton VIC 3053 Australia
Telephone: +61 3 93442746
Email: ann.cornish@rwh.org.au
Affiliation: 
Key inclusion & exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:

Age minimum: Not stated
Age maximum: Not stated
Gender: Both males and females
Health Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied
Renal and Urogenital - Other renal and urogenital disorders
Stress urinary incontinence;
Stress urinary incontinence
Intervention(s)
Laparoscopic or open Burch colposuspension performed on women with genuine stress urinary incontinence.
Primary Outcome(s)
Absence of stress urinary incontinence as measured by urodynamics[6 months post operatively]
Secondary Outcome(s)
Postoperative pain and analgesic requirements for both procedures.[]
Impact of surgical intervention on patients quality oif life.[]
Time taken to return to normal activities.[]
Cost difference between open and laparoscopic procedures.[]
Secondary ID(s)
Source(s) of Monetary Support
Urogynaecology Unit Royal Womens Hospital
Secondary Sponsor(s)
As above
Ethics review
Status: Not approved
Approval date:
Contact:
Mercy Hospital for Women
Status: Not approved
Approval date:
Contact:
Monash medical Centre
Status: Not approved
Approval date:
Contact:
Royal Womens Hospital Melbourne
Results
Results available:
Date Posted:
Date Completed:
URL:
Disclaimer: Trials posted on this search portal are not endorsed by WHO, but are provided as a service to our users. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for any damages arising from the use of the information linked to in this section. None of the information obtained through use of the search portal should in any way be used in clinical care without consulting a physician or licensed health professional. WHO is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness and/or use made of the content displayed for any trial record.
Copyright - World Health Organization - Version 3.6 - Version history