World Health Organization site
Skip Navigation Links

Main
Note: This record shows only 22 elements of the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. To view changes that have been made to the source record, or for additional information about this trial, click on the URL below to go to the source record in the primary register.
Register: REBEC
Last refreshed on: 29 May 2023
Main ID:  RBR-4y8vd2
Date of registration: 19/06/2017
Prospective Registration: No
Primary sponsor: Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo - FMRP/USP
Public title: Acupuncture as another treatment option for women who have Pain in the belly foot and Muscle Pain in the belly that did not improve with the Injection of Anesthetic at the pain site
Scientific title: Acupuncture as an alternative method for the treatment of women with Chronic Pelvic Pain and Myofascial Syndrome not-responsive to Topical Injectable Treatment
Date of first enrolment: 11/07/2014
Target sample size:
Recruitment status: Data analysis completed
URL:  http://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-4y8vd2
Study type:  Intervention
Study design:  A double-blind, parallel, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial  
Phase:  N/A
Countries of recruitment
Brazil
Contacts
Name: Andréia Moreira de Souza   Mitidieri
Address:  Rua Euclides da Cunha, 1069 16025-090 Araçatuba Brazil
Telephone: +551831176089
Email: andreia_fisiob@yahoo.com.br
Affiliation:  Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo - FMRP/USP
Name: Andréia Moreira de Souza   Mitidieri
Address:  Rua Euclides da Cunha, 1069 16025-090 Araçatuba Brazil
Telephone: +551831176089
Email: andreia_fisiob@yahoo.com.br
Affiliation:  Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo - FMRP/USP
Key inclusion & exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Women with diagnostic criteria for chronic pelvic pain secondary to abdominal myofascial syndrome; Presence of only one active trigger point on the abdominal wall, have not undergone previous treatment with topical injectable block or acupuncture, age above 18 years and premenopausal, visual analogue scale with a value above 4.4 (moderate pain)
Exclusion criteria: Women with anticoagulation or hemorrhagic disorders, local or systemic infections; Allergy to anesthetics, acute muscle trauma, extreme fear of needles; History of complaints of chronic musculoskeletal pain such as fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue or diabetes; Aspirin intake within 3 days after injection; All patients with suspected endometriosis, interstitial cystitis, irritable bowel syndrome, or other disease that warrants or contributes to chronic pelvic pain; Endometrioma or hernia evidenced by ultrasound of the abdominal wall, infections of the abdominal wall, lack after the beginning of the treatment

Age minimum: 18Y
Age maximum: 50Y
Gender: F
Health Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied
Myofascial pain syndromes, pelvic pain
C05.651.550
C23.888.592.612.944
Intervention(s)
Other
Procedure/surgery
D27.505.696.277.100
Experiential group: 16 women with abdominal muscle pain received acupuncture ashi treatment (acupuncture technique at pain points), was applied once a week for 10 consecutive weeks by an acupuncturist while in the active control group an injection of anesthesia medication (2ml with 1% of an anesthetic called lidocaine) at the point of pain in 19 women with abdominal pain syndrome was performed once a week for 4 consecutive weeks by physicians. The treatments were randomized (lottery) among the participants of this study.
E02.190.044
Primary Outcome(s)
Primary outcome: decreased pain perception through the Visual Analogue Scale, Numerical Categorical Scale, McGill Pain and Algometry Questionnaire with a pressure manometer based on a significance level of 5% in pre and 1 week, 1 month , 3 months and 6 months after the interventions.
There was a reduction in the perception of pain in the participants of this study through analysis of the visual analog scale, numerical categorical scale and McGill questionnaire, and there was a correlation between these analyzed variables. At the algometry examination there was no reduction in the perception of statistically significant pain.
Secondary Outcome(s)
There was no statistically significant change in the aspects related to quality of life or risk for anxiety and depression in the study participants for both groups.
Secondary outcome: quality of life measurement using the SF-36 questionnaire and anxiety and depression risk assessment using the hospital scale of anxiety and depression (HAD), based on a 5% level of significance in the pre and 1 measurements Week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the interventions.
Secondary ID(s)
Source(s) of Monetary Support
Comissão de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal do Nível Superior
Secondary Sponsor(s)
Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo - FMRP/USP
Ethics review
Results
Results available:
Date Posted:
Date Completed:
URL:
Disclaimer: Trials posted on this search portal are not endorsed by WHO, but are provided as a service to our users. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for any damages arising from the use of the information linked to in this section. None of the information obtained through use of the search portal should in any way be used in clinical care without consulting a physician or licensed health professional. WHO is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness and/or use made of the content displayed for any trial record.
Copyright - World Health Organization - Version 3.6 - Version history