World Health Organization site
Skip Navigation Links

Main
Note: This record shows only 22 elements of the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. To view changes that have been made to the source record, or for additional information about this trial, click on the URL below to go to the source record in the primary register.
Register: REBEC
Last refreshed on: 29 May 2023
Main ID:  RBR-2jmbvt
Date of registration: 07/07/2016
Prospective Registration: No
Primary sponsor: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, da Usp
Public title: Clinical performance of two types of dental restorations: atraumatic and conventional
Scientific title: Randomized clinical trial of Class II ART restorations in deciduous teeth, with and without proximal retentions, and in permanent teeth in comparison with composite resin
Date of first enrolment: 06/10/2014
Target sample size:
Recruitment status: Recruitment completed
URL:  http://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-2jmbvt
Study type:  Intervention
Study design:  Interventional, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel clinic treatment with 2 arms.  
Phase:  N/A
Countries of recruitment
Argentina Brazil Peru
Contacts
Name: Maria Fidela de Lima   Navarro
Address:  Avenida Professor Almeida Prado, 1280, Butantã 05508-900 São Paulo Brazil
Telephone: 55-11 - 30914700
Email: mflnavar@usp.br
Affiliation:  Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, da Usp
Name: Maria Fidela de Lima   Navarro
Address:  Avenida Professor Almeida Prado, 1280, Butantã 05508-900 São Paulo Brazil
Telephone: 55-11 - 30914700
Email: mflnavar@usp.br
Affiliation:  Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, da Usp
Key inclusion & exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: For Hypothesis I the children aged between 4 and 7 year with good general health and having class II cavities in deciduous teeth without pulp involvement or pain will be included.
For Hypothesis II the children aged between 8 and 12year; adolescent and adult between 13 and 44 year with good general health and 1 until 4 class II cavities in permanent teeth without pulp involvement or pain will be included.

Exclusion criteria: For Hypothesis I the children presenting behavioral problems; teeth with signs of sepsis, mobility or paranormal occlusion habits and absence of contacts with opposing or neighboring teeth will be excluded.
For Hypothesis II the children; adolescents and adults presenting teeth with signs of sepsis; mobility; more than 4 class II cavities in permanent teeth or paranormal occlusion habits and absence of contacts with opposing or neighboring teeth will be excluded.


Age minimum: 4Y
Age maximum: 44Y
Gender: -
Health Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied
dental caries.
Intervention(s)
Procedure/surgery
The study is parallel group, in primary teeth, with a test group (ART restorations with proximal retention), and a control group (ART restorations without proximal retention) for a total of 147 restorations for each group involved. For that ART restorations will be made with or without additional retention using Equia glass ionomer cement.
For the permanent teeth , there will be a test group (ART restorations with proximal retention), and a control group (class II conventional composite resin restorations)in a total of 134 restorations for each stakeholder group. ART restorations with additional retention will be made for the test group and for the control group resin composite restorations will be made using the Z-350 XT resin.
For making additional retention grooves a spoon excavator number 3 ART SSWhite Kit, Duflex will be used on the buccal and lingual walls of the proximal boxes of ARt Class II restorations.
Primary Outcome(s)
For Hypothesis I there is no difference in the clinical performance of ART class II restorations in deciduous teeth with and without additional retentions. For Hypothesis II there is no difference in the clinical performance of ART class II restorations in permanent teeth with additional retentions in comparison with composite resin restorations.
The criteria for this evaluation will be the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) and the US Public Health Assessment System (USPHS) after six months and one year and two years and three years.
Secondary Outcome(s)
For Class II ART restorations after six months and one year and two years and three years there will be 95% restoration success.
For composite restorations class II after 6 months and 1 year and 2 years and 3 years there will be 97% restoration success.
In both cases the adopted evaluation criteria will be the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) and the US Public Health Assessment System (USPHS) after six months and one year and two years and three years.
Secondary ID(s)
Source(s) of Monetary Support
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Secondary Sponsor(s)
Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde da Universidade de Brasília
Faculdad de Odontologia Catolica de Córdoba
Faculdad San Martin de Porres
Ethics review
Results
Results available:
Date Posted:
Date Completed:
URL:
Disclaimer: Trials posted on this search portal are not endorsed by WHO, but are provided as a service to our users. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for any damages arising from the use of the information linked to in this section. None of the information obtained through use of the search portal should in any way be used in clinical care without consulting a physician or licensed health professional. WHO is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness and/or use made of the content displayed for any trial record.
Copyright - World Health Organization - Version 3.6 - Version history