World Health Organization site
Skip Navigation Links

Main
Note: This record shows only 22 elements of the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. To view changes that have been made to the source record, or for additional information about this trial, click on the URL below to go to the source record in the primary register.
Register: ISRCTN
Last refreshed on: 5 January 2021
Main ID:  ISRCTN27208571
Date of registration: 14/12/2015
Prospective Registration: No
Primary sponsor: University College London
Public title: Laser compared to topical medicine as primary treatment for glaucoma in Africa
Scientific title: To compare selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) with prostaglandin analogue as first line therapy in African Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) patients
Date of first enrolment: 11/02/2014
Target sample size: 571
Recruitment status: Completed
URL:  http://isrctn.com/ISRCTN27208571
Study type:  Interventional
Study design:  Two centre randomised prospective trial (Treatment)  
Phase:  Not Specified
Countries of recruitment
Kenya South Africa
Contacts
Name: Ian    Murdoch
Address:  Institute of Ophtalmology EC1V 9EL London United Kingdom
Telephone: +4426086896
Email: i.murdoch@ucl.ac.uk
Affiliation: 
Name:    
Address: 
Telephone:
Email:
Affiliation: 
Key inclusion & exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria:
1. Consent to inclusion and participation in trial
2. Characteristic glaucomatous changes in the optic disc. The presence of a focal or diffuse area of optic disc rim loss, so that the neuroretinal rim tissue in any quadrant is less than 5% of the disc diameter in that meridian. Extensive loss of neuroretinal rim tissue with marked optic disc cupping giving a cup disc ratio greater than 0.6
3. A measured intraocular pressure greater than or equal to 21 mmHg and less than or equal to 30mmHg on at least one visit before the time of entry into the study as measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry
4. Adequate visualization of angle structures (i.e. clear media and cooperative patient)
5. Black African patients

Exclusion criteria:
1. Unwillingness to participate in the study
2. Inability/unwillingness to give informed consent
3. Unwillingness to accept randomisation
4. Patient less than 20 years of age
5. Anterior segment neovascularisation
6. Past trauma to the eye or ocular adnexae
7. Retinal or optic nerve neovascularisation
8. Aphakia or pseudophakia
9. Previous ocular surgery Evidence of ocular disease other than glaucoma that might affect the measurements of IOP, assessment of visual function, visual field testing would likely require cataract surgery within 12 months of randomization on systemic medications known to ­IOP (e.g. steroids) Pregnancy or female of childbearing age who may be pregnant at time of treatment (LMP).
10. Anyone who is not Black African race


Age minimum:
Age maximum:
Gender: Both
Health Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied
Primary open-angle glaucoma
Eye Diseases
Primary open-angle glaucoma
Intervention(s)

After informed consent all patients undergo a standardised examination to establish baseline ocular function and findings. All patients receive counselling in glaucoma, the disease, what it means and the therapy. Each patient is then randomised (randomisation in London, contained in sealed opaque envelopes) to receive SLT or prostaglandin analogue therapy. Every effort is made to follow all patients according to a standardised protocol at a minimum of 3, 6 and 12 months. All therapeutic failures are followed closely to ascertain further management plans and subsequent therapeutic compliance. Follow-up is offered beyond 12 months.

Follow-up:
1. At 3 months: Patients will have a structured questionnaire relating to any adverse effects from the therapeutic interventions. They will receive an examination of visual function, external ocular structures and intraocular pressure in addition to the optic nerve head. Those with unacceptable topical/systemic side effects and those with partial or complete failure of IOP control (see outcomes) will have secondary therapy commenced in the form of timolol 0.5% or, if contraindicated, either brimonidine or oral acetazolamide)). The secondary therapy will either replace or be additive to the primary therapy depending on the initial response.
2. At 6 months: Patients will have a structured questionnaire relating to any adverse effects from therapeutic interventions. They will receive and examination of visual function, external ocular structures and intraocular pressure in addition to the optic nerve head. Those with unacceptable topical/systemic side effects and those with partial or complete failure of IOP control (see outcomes) will have secondary or tertiary therapy c
Primary Outcome(s)
Intraocular pressure reduction at one year. A reduction of 30% or more at one year is complete success and a reduction of 15-29% is partial success. In addition the proportion with an IOP less than 21, less than 17 and less than 14mmHg will be assessed as measured using Goldmann tonometry.
Secondary Outcome(s)

1. Visual function assessed as change in logMAR acuity
2. Progression of lens opacity assessed as change in LOCS III score
3. Reintervention rate- number experiencing reintervention during first year post commencement of therapy
4. Reintervention acceptance – number accepting reintervention during first year post commencement of therapy
5. Compliance – this is being assessed by weighing bottles prior to issuance and on return to the pharmacy for receipt of the next round of therapy (the difference in weight represents the number of drops administered from the bottle and will be compared to the number of doses that should have been taken during the period
6. Compliance via a questionnaire to both patients and clinician
7. Complications – number of adverse events during the first year of therapy
Secondary ID(s)
N/A
Source(s) of Monetary Support
International Glaucoma Association (UK)
Secondary Sponsor(s)
Ethics review
Status:
Approval date:
Contact:
1. University College London Ethical Committee, 01/10/2014, ref: 5497/001 2. Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (BREC), 15/05/2012, ref: BFC107/11 3. Aga Khan University Faculty of Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee, 06/05/2013, ref: 2012/24
Results
Results available: Yes
Date Posted:
Date Completed: 30/11/2018
URL:
Disclaimer: Trials posted on this search portal are not endorsed by WHO, but are provided as a service to our users. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for any damages arising from the use of the information linked to in this section. None of the information obtained through use of the search portal should in any way be used in clinical care without consulting a physician or licensed health professional. WHO is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness and/or use made of the content displayed for any trial record.
Copyright - World Health Organization - Version 3.6 - Version history