World Health Organization site
Skip Navigation Links

Main
Note: This record shows only 22 elements of the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. To view changes that have been made to the source record, or for additional information about this trial, click on the URL below to go to the source record in the primary register.
Register: ISRCTN
Last refreshed on: 29 November 2021
Main ID:  ISRCTN10867442
Date of registration: 05/07/2017
Prospective Registration: No
Primary sponsor: Liverpool John Moores University
Public title: Thinking about your best possible self: Using a psychological writing task to improve your diabetes self-management
Scientific title: Adopting the 'Best Possible Self' task to improve diabetes self-management: A randomised controlled trial
Date of first enrolment: 03/07/2017
Target sample size: 76
Recruitment status: Completed
URL:  https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10867442
Study type:  Interventional
Study design:  Double-blinded 3x2 randomised controlled trial (Quality of life)  
Phase:  Not Applicable
Countries of recruitment
Australia Canada England France Germany Italy Netherlands New Zealand
Spain United Kingdom United States of America
Contacts
Name: Benjamin    Gibson
Address:  Liverpool John Moores University School of Natural Sciences & Psychology Tom Reilly Building Byrom Street L3 3AF Liverpool United Kingdom
Telephone:
Email:
Affiliation: 
Name: Kanayo    Umeh
Address:  Liverpool John Moores University School of Natural Sciences & Psychology Tom Reilly Building Byrom Street L3 3AF Liverpool United Kingdom
Telephone:
Email:
Affiliation: 
Key inclusion & exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria:
1. Mentally healthy adults over the age of 18 with a formal diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes
2. Participants must already be daily self-monitoring their blood sugar levels
3. They must also regularly receive HbA1c levels from their health care professional (e.g. GP or nurse)

Exclusion criteria:
1. Under the age of 18
2. Have a form of diabetes not listed in the inclusion criteria such as gestational diabetes. This is simply because they are less common, preventing an easy split of the data.
3. Anyone with an affective disorder (e.g. anxiety, depression, eating disorders; all of which are common co-morbidities of diabetes) will also be excluded because of the nature of the study (i.e. a trial with a focus on emotions and emotion induction) as they might be at too much undue risk


Age minimum:
Age maximum:
Gender: Both
Health Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied
Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes
Nutritional, Metabolic, Endocrine
Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes
Intervention(s)

Participants are randomly allocated to one of five groups based on intervention type and dosage level.

Those in the first two groups receive the ‘treatment’ condition: a tailored-for-diabetes version of the ‘Best Possible Self’ informed by feedback from diabetes patients as part of a previous study. These individuals are split based on whether they are in a ‘daily’ group or a ‘twice weekly’ group which indicates how frequently they have to do the task. This involves completing a series of questionnaires online that measures aspects of your self-management care and general well-being.

The next two groups receive the ‘placebo’ condition: a standard version of the ‘Best Possible Self’ task. They too are split into separate ‘daily’ or ‘twice weekly’ groups.

The fifth, and final, group are put on a waiting list; they act as the ‘control’ condition. All participants (with the exception of the placebo group) complete the task as frequently as they have been told to do for a period of four weeks. All participants (including the placebo group) are followed up at the end of this four week period.

Participants report recent blood sugar results as well as some basic personal information such as age, gender, ethnicity, and BMI.

Randomisation is handled by the Qualtrics software that hosts the trial. The software evenly presents information so that each group should have the same number of participants. Using the software to randomise group allocation allows the study to be double-blinded.
Primary Outcome(s)

1. Positive psychological changes are measured using the PANAS questionnaire at baseline, immediately after allocation to assess exposure effects, and trial end (end of week 4)
2. Depression and anxiety levels are measured using the HADS questionnaire at baseline and trial end (end of week 4)
3. Self-Management behaviours are measured using the DSMQ questionnaire at baseline and trial end (end of week 4)
Secondary Outcome(s)
1. Blood sugar control is measured using changes in daily self-reported blood sugar results and changes in HbA1c results (if available) across the duration of the trial. Participants provide their last fasting and pre-prandial blood sugar results at baseline and then self-report subsequent results once a week in response to a reminder email. They provide their previous HbA1c at baseline and report any changes (if there were any during the trial period) at trial end (end of week 4).
Secondary ID(s)
17/NSP/026
Source(s) of Monetary Support
Liverpool John Moores University
Secondary Sponsor(s)
Ethics review
Status:
Approval date:
Contact:
Results
Results available: Yes
Date Posted:
Date Completed: 11/03/2019
URL:
Disclaimer: Trials posted on this search portal are not endorsed by WHO, but are provided as a service to our users. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for any damages arising from the use of the information linked to in this section. None of the information obtained through use of the search portal should in any way be used in clinical care without consulting a physician or licensed health professional. WHO is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness and/or use made of the content displayed for any trial record.
Copyright - World Health Organization - Version 3.6 - Version history