|
Main
|
|
Note: This record shows only 22 elements of the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. To view changes that have been made to the source record, or for additional information about this trial, click on the URL below to go to the source record in the primary register. |
|
Register:
|
ANZCTR |
|
Last refreshed on:
|
11 June 2018 |
|
Main ID: |
ACTRN12618000399291 |
|
Date of registration:
|
20/03/2018 |
|
Prospective Registration:
|
No |
|
Primary sponsor: |
|
|
Public title:
|
Clinical Evaluation and Comparison of the Effectiveness of Platelet Rich Fibrin versus Buccal Advancement Flap Surgery for the Immediate Closure of Acute Oroantral Communications
|
|
Scientific title:
|
Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes (pain, analgesics doses taken, swelling) of PRF application versus Buccal Advancement Flap Surgery for the closure of acute oroantral communications (OACs). |
|
Date of first enrolment:
|
25/11/2011 |
|
Target sample size:
|
36 |
|
Recruitment status: |
Completed |
|
URL:
|
http://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12618000399291.aspx |
|
Study type:
|
Interventional |
|
Study design:
|
Randomised controlled trial
Parallel |
|
Phase:
|
|
|
|
Key inclusion & exclusion criteria
|
|
Health Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied
|
|
Acute oroantral communications
|
|
Intervention(s)
|
In 36 patients, following the extractions of maxillary posterior teeth, Acute oroantral communications (OACs) which were larger than 3mm diameter were detected. In group A, 21 patients were treated with the use of platelet rich fibrin (PRF) and in group B, buccal advancement flap was used in 15 patients.
1st intervention (group A): Two PRF clots were used for the treatment of acute OACs. Blood samples of each patient were taken directly into 2 x 10 mL glass-coated plastic tubes (excluding anticoagulant, and immediately centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min (Elektro-mag, M415P, Istanbul). The platelet-poor plasma was separated from middle part (PRF) that accumulated at the top of the tube and collected the PRF from roughly 2 mm below its’ contact point with the red corpuscles to include any remaining platelets.Then, two PRF clots were gently placed into the extraction cavity and sutured to avoid them from escaping to the sinus and for stabilization.
2nd intervention (group B): Buccal advancement flap was used to close acute oroantral communications. The extraction socket was closed by sliding the buccal flap over the socket and suturing the flap to the undermined palatal mucosa.
All interventions were performed by oral and maxillofacial surgeon.
|
|
Source(s) of Monetary Support
|
|
Results
|
|
Results available:
|
|
|
Date Posted:
|
|
|
Date Completed:
|
|
|
URL:
|
|
|
|