Main
|
Note: This record shows only 22 elements of the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. To view changes that have been made to the source record, or for additional information about this trial, click on the URL below to go to the source record in the primary register. |
Register:
|
ISRCTN |
Last refreshed on:
|
17 October 2016 |
Main ID: |
ISRCTN23244695 |
Date of registration:
|
14/01/2014 |
Prospective Registration:
|
No |
Primary sponsor: |
|
Public title:
|
London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP): Intervention to reduce antisocial behaviour and improve educational/occupational attainment for pupils at risk of school exclusion
|
Scientific title:
|
London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP): a cluster-randomised controlled trial of an intervention to reduce antisocial behaviour and improve educational/occupational attainment for pupils at risk of school exclusion |
Date of first enrolment:
|
01/05/2013 |
Target sample size:
|
800 |
Recruitment status: |
Completed |
URL:
|
http://isrctn.com/ISRCTN23244695 |
Study type:
|
Interventional |
Study design:
|
Cluster randomised controlled trial (Treatment)
|
Phase:
|
|
|
Countries of recruitment
|
United Kingdom
| | | | | | | |
Contacts
|
Name:
|
Manuel
Eisner |
Address:
|
Institute of Criminology
University of Cambridge
Sidgwick Site
CB3 9DA
Cambridge
United Kingdom |
Telephone:
|
|
Email:
|
|
Affiliation:
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Address:
|
|
Telephone:
|
|
Email:
|
|
Affiliation:
|
|
| |
Key inclusion & exclusion criteria
|
Inclusion criteria: School level: More than or equal to 28% of children eligible for free school meals
Young people: 1. Entering Year 9 or 10 in September 2013 2. Identified by the school as at high risk for school exclusion and/or becoming NEET based on: 2.1. having had previous school exclusions, 2.2. unauthorised absences, and 2.3. having engaged in behaviours that lead to other disciplinary measures
Exclusion criteria: School level: 1. Pupil Referral Units and 'special' schools 2. Schools already participating in initiatives funded by the European Social Fund (ESF) and the Greater London Authority (GLA)
Age minimum:
Age maximum:
Gender:
Both
|
Health Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied
|
Behaviour problems which place them at the highest-risk for school exclusion and decreased educational attainment Mental and Behavioural Disorders
|
Intervention(s)
|
The participating schools are randomised to two groups:
1. Intervention The intervention provided by Catch 22 is delivered in three main components: group work sessions, one-to-one meetings and family support. It targets a number of individual risk factors including students? poor communication skills (e.g. ineffective strategies to request attention, difficulties sharing emotions, avoidance of eye contact for social interactions), hidden communication needs (e.g. receptive-expressive language difficulties), behavioural problems in school (e.g. disruptive behaviour in the classrooms, violence), academic problems, poor attainment and attendance below the expected level. At the family level, the intervention targets risk factors such as poor family support for academic activities whereas at the school level, the intervention is focused on risk factors such as poor classroom management.
2. Control Schools in the control group are offered a one-off workshop delivered by trained corporate volunteers. These workshop sessions address employability skills of young people, provide insight into the world of work and facilitate discussions concerning employment.
|
Primary Outcome(s)
|
Behaviour problems - antisocial behaviour. This will be measured via self-reported questionnaires, teacher-reported questionnaires as well as official data with respect to educational outcomes. They are collected at baseline and 1-3 months following the intervention.
|
Secondary Outcome(s)
|
Educational and occupational attainment. This will be measured via self-reported questionnaires, teacher-reported questionnaires as well as official data with respect to educational outcomes. They are collected at baseline and 1-3 months following the intervention.
|
Source(s) of Monetary Support
|
The evaluation is funded by the European Commission, Social Experimentation Grant (EC reference VS/2012/0345) awarded to the Greater London Authority/University of Cambridge (UK), The intervention is funded by the Education Endowment Foundation (UK)
|
Results
|
Results available:
|
|
Date Posted:
|
|
Date Completed:
|
|
URL:
|
|
|
|