World Health Organization site
Skip Navigation Links

Main
Note: This record shows only 22 elements of the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. To view changes that have been made to the source record, or for additional information about this trial, click on the URL below to go to the source record in the primary register.
Register: ISRCTN
Last refreshed on: 2 September 2019
Main ID:  ISRCTN06697555
Date of registration: 16/04/2014
Prospective Registration: Yes
Primary sponsor: Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd. (India)
Public title: Prospective clinical trial to compare safety & efficacy of BioMime Sirolimus stent Vs. Xience Everolimus stent by random assignment for treatment of coronary artery disease at multinational centres
Scientific title: A prospective, active control open label, multicentre randomized clinical trial for comparison between BioMime Sirolimus Eluting Stent of Meril Life Sciences Pvt.Ltd. and Xience Xpedition Everolimus Eluting stent of Abbott Vascular Inc. to evaluate efficacy and safety in Coronary Artery Disease
Date of first enrolment: 20/04/2014
Target sample size: 258
Recruitment status: Completed
URL:  http://isrctn.com/ISRCTN06697555
Study type:  Interventional
Study design:  Two year multi centre open label randomized parallel group active control comparator clinical trial (Treatment)  
Phase:  Not Applicable
Countries of recruitment
Belgium Brazil Italy Latvia Netherlands Spain Switzerland United Kingdom
Contacts
Name: Ashish    Indani
Address:  612, Midas, Sahar Plaza Andheri (E) 400 059 Mumbai India
Telephone:
Email:
Affiliation: 
Name:    
Address: 
Telephone:
Email:
Affiliation: 
Key inclusion & exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria:
1. The patient must be =18 years of age.
2. Clinical evidence of ischemic heart disease and/or a positive territorial functional study. Documented stable angina pectoris (Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Classification 1, 2, 3 or 4) or unstable angina pectoris with documented ischemia (Braunwald Class IB-C, IIB-C, or IIIB-C), or documented silent ischemia
3. The patient has a planned intervention of up to two de-novo native lesions
4. Target lesion reference diameter = 2.5 mm and = 3.5 mm in diameter (visually estimated)
5.The target lesion length is less than or equal to 46 mm (visually estimated)
6. Patient willing to provide written informed consent.
7. If the patient is a female, she should be without childbearing potential who has undergone surgical sterilization or is post-menopausal.
8. The patient and the patient?s physician agree to the follow-up visits including a 9 month angiographic follow-up.

Exclusion criteria:
1. Evidence of an acute Q-wave or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction within 72 hours preceding the index procedure, unless the CK and CK-MB enzymes are less than twice the Upper Normal Limit.
2. The patient has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the requisite medications including aspirin, heparin, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, sirolimus, everolimus.
3. There is an untreated significant lesion of > 40% diameter stenosis remaining proximal or distal to the target site after the planned intervention.
4. Previous placement of any stent at the target lesion and/or within 10 mm of the target lesion.
5. Lesion with a significant side branch (branch diameter >2 mm) that would be covered by stenting
6. Total occlusion or TIMI 0 coronary flow in the target vessel.
7. Left Main coronary artery disease (stenosis >50%)
8. The proximal target vessel or target lesion is severely calcified by visual assessment.
9. Aorto-ostial location, unprotected left main lesion location, or a lesion within 5 mm of the origin of the LAD or LCX.
10. The patient has a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or will refuse blood transfusions
11. The patient suffered a stroke, transient ischemic neurological attack (TIA) or significant gastrointestinal (GI) bleed within the past 6 months
12. The patient has renal insufficiency as determined by a creatinine of > 2.0mg/dl or 180 µmol/l.
13. The target lesion, or the target vessel proximal to the target lesion contains thrombus
14. Documented left ventricular ejection fraction of =30%
15. The patient is a recipient of a heart transplant
16. The patient has extensive peripheral vascular disease that precludes safe 6 French sheath insertion or extreme angulations of the vessel at accesslocation (< 45 degrees)
17. The patient has other medical illness (i.e., cancer or congestive heart failure) that may cause the patient to be non-compliant with the protocol, confound the data interpretation or is associated with limited life expectancy (i.e., less than one year)
18. The patient is simultaneously participating in another investigational device or drug study.


Age minimum:
Age maximum:
Gender: Both
Health Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied
De novo native coronary artery lesions
Circulatory System
Intervention(s)

There will be overall 258 subjects (86 in Control arm and 172 in Study arm) after proper screening and obtaining informed consent form. The randomization will be IWRS based 2:1 randomization of the patients. There will be no stratification factors applied to the population. All the subjects will undergo interventional stent Implantation (Angioplasty) as a part of their treatment, it is not added intervention for protocol. However, the stent choice will be by IWRS-based randomization.

Patients will be followed clinically for a period of 2 years. All patients will undergo angiographic follow-up at 9.5 months. All subjects in the study will undergo the clinical follow-up at 30 ± 7 days, 5 months ± 7 days, 12 months ± 7 days and 24 months ± 7 days. QCA assessment will be performed both at baseline and at 9 months after enrolment.
Primary Outcome(s)
To assess in-stent Late Lumen Loss at 9 months for both treatment strategies
Secondary Outcome(s)

Angiographic endpoints:
1. Binary Restenosis (DS =50%) at 9 months
2. MLD and %DS post procedure at 9 months
3. In-segment Late Lumen Loss at 9 months
All measurements will be made of the in-stent, in-segment, proximal and distal stent margins.

Clinical endpoints:
1. Acute success (Device and Procedural success)
2. Device-oriented Composite Endpoints at 1, 5, 9, 12 and 24 months and its individual components. (Device-oriented Composite Endpoint (DoCE) is defined as cardiac death, MI not clearly attributable to a non-intervention vessel, and clinically-indicated target lesion revascularization)
3. Non clinically-indicated Target Lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1, 5, 9, 12 and 24 months
4. Clinically-indicated and non clinically-indicated Target Vessel revascularization (TVR) at 1, 5, 9, 12 and 24 months
Secondary ID(s)
2013-005353-67
BioM/RCT/12/03
NCT02112981
Source(s) of Monetary Support
Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd. (India)
Secondary Sponsor(s)
Ethics review
Status:
Approval date:
Contact:
Not provided at time of registration
Results
Results available: Yes
Date Posted:
Date Completed: 20/10/2016
URL:
Disclaimer: Trials posted on this search portal are not endorsed by WHO, but are provided as a service to our users. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for any damages arising from the use of the information linked to in this section. None of the information obtained through use of the search portal should in any way be used in clinical care without consulting a physician or licensed health professional. WHO is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness and/or use made of the content displayed for any trial record.
Copyright - World Health Organization - Version 3.6 - Version history