National Policy on Traditional Medicine and Regulation of Herbal Medicines - Report of a WHO Global Survey
(2005; 168 pages) Voir le document au format PDF
Table des matières
Afficher le documentAcknowledgements
Afficher le documentExecutive summary
Afficher le documentAcronyms, abbreviations and definitions
Afficher le documentWHO Regions
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu1. Introduction
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu2. National policy on traditional medicine and complementary/alternative medicine
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu3. The regulatory situation of herbal medicines
Fermer ce répertoire4. Member States, WHO and herbal medicines
Afficher le document4.1 Main difficulties faced by countries
Afficher le document4.2 WHO support
Afficher le document4.3 Survey results
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu5. Country summaries
Afficher le documentReferences
Afficher le documentAnnex 1. Text of survey instrument
 

4.2 WHO support

Next, countries were asked to rate the types of support offered by WHO related to herbal medicines according to their needs and interests. They were asked to rate the following categories as “not needed”, “needed” or “much needed”: information sharing on regulatory issues; training workshops about national capacity to establish regulations on herbal medicine; general guidelines for research and evaluation of traditional medicines; training workshops about national capacity building on safety monitoring of herbal medicines; provision of databases; arrangement of global meetings; other types of support.

Figure 44 provides a detailed breakdown of the rating of each category of WHO support; as different numbers of countries ranked each category, the figures are given below for clarification purposes (Table 3). While a majority of countries ranked every category as “much needed”, the category cited by the most countries and the one most often ranked “much needed” was the category of information sharing on regulatory issues.


Figure 44. Member States' needs for WHO support

Table 3. Types of support requested by Member States, by level of preference

 

Much needed

Needed

Not needed

Total answers

Information sharing on regulatory issues

83

44

4

131

Herbal medicine regulation workshops

66

44

9

119

General guidelines on research and evaluation of herbal medicines

70

47

5

122

Herbal medicine safety monitoring workshops

68

48

7

123

Provision of databases

67

50

3

120

Global meetings

50

55

12

117

Other

16

8

0

24

Of the 24 countries selecting other forms of support, the following were the suggestions reported: assistance with registration of traditional medicine; intellectual property issues; funding to develop a national database of traditional medicine and herbs; scientific references and research; equipment, facilities and funding for research; support and funding for the development of national pharmacopoeias and monographs; support for the development of regional monographs; standard normative system for herbal medicine; a workshop on adverse effect reporting, monitoring and analysis; periodic consultant visits; visit by WHO technical advisors to assess the national situation of medicinal plants; pharmacovigilance and assistance with policy development.

vers la section précédente
vers la section suivante
 
 
Le Portail d'information - Médicaments essentiels et produits de santé a été conçu et est maintenu par l'ONG Human Info. Dernière mise à jour: le 7 octobre 2014