National Policy on Traditional Medicine and Regulation of Herbal Medicines - Report of a WHO Global Survey
(2005; 168 pages) Voir le document au format PDF
Table des matières
Afficher le documentAcknowledgements
Afficher le documentExecutive summary
Afficher le documentAcronyms, abbreviations and definitions
Afficher le documentWHO Regions
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu1. Introduction
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu2. National policy on traditional medicine and complementary/alternative medicine
Fermer ce répertoire3. The regulatory situation of herbal medicines
Afficher le document3.1 Law or regulation on herbal medicines
Afficher le document3.2 Regulatory status of herbal medicines
Afficher le document3.3 Claims
Afficher le document3.4 Pharmacopoeias
Afficher le document3.5 Monographs on herbal medicines
Afficher le document3.6 Manufacture of herbal medicines
Afficher le document3.7 Safety and herbal medicines
Afficher le document3.8 Registration system for herbal medicines
Afficher le document3.9 Herbal medicines and the essential drug list
Afficher le document3.10 Post marketing surveillance of herbal medicines
Afficher le document3.11 The sale of herbal medicines
Afficher le document3.12 Annual market sales of herbal medicines
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu4. Member States, WHO and herbal medicines
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu5. Country summaries
Afficher le documentReferences
Afficher le documentAnnex 1. Text of survey instrument
 

3.7 Safety and herbal medicines

Member States were next asked a series of questions related to safety and herbal medicines. The first question asked countries to describe those regulatory requirements used for the safety assessment of herbal medicines. The following options were given: same requirements as for conventional pharmaceuticals, special requirements or no requirements. If Member States chose the option “special requirements”, they were further asked to choose all that applied from the following options: traditional use without demonstrated harmful effects, reference to documented scientific research on similar products, and other requirements. If other requirements were selected, the respondents were asked to describe the requirement.

A total of 130 Member States responded to this question: however, as respondents were asked to choose all that applied, there are more responses than respondents for this question (Figure 30). Eighty two countries indicated that special regulatory requirements exist for herbal medicine. Of the remaining responses, 57 countries indicated that the same regulatory requirements for safety assessment apply to herbal medicines as to conventional pharmaceuticals. Finally, 28 countries indicated that no regulatory requirements for safety assessment exist in their country.


Figure 30. Regulatory requirements for safety assessment of herbal medicines

When selecting the category “special requirements”, countries were further asked to choose the relevant categories of special requirement, or to describe other special requirements. Sixty-six countries of the 82 that chose the category of special requirements indicated that their laws and regulations employ the regulatory requirement of traditional use without demonstrated harmful effects, while 53 countries indicated that they had a regulatory requirement for reference to documented scientific research (Figure 31). Please note that, as countries were able to choose all options that apply, the number of responses exceeds the number of responding countries.


Figure 31. Special regulatory requirements for safety assessment of herbal medicines

Twenty-one countries chose the option “other” and provided details on other regulatory requirements for safety assessment. These included the following: clinical studies, bibliographical documents, screening of herbs not suitable for food use, screening for toxic elements, radioactivity and heavy metals, well-established use, traditional literature documentation and toxicological studies.

Finally, countries were asked whether control mechanisms exist for the regulatory requirements for safety assessment detailed above and, if so, a brief description was requested. Though 125 Member States responded, the figure below only includes 106 since it excludes those that did not respond to the previous question, or responded solely that that there are no requirements. Of the responding countries, 67%, or 71 countries, indicated that such control mechanisms exist (Figure 32). The control mechanisms were also specified in some cases, of which licensing and registration, laboratory testing and pharmacovigilance centres were among the most frequently cited.


Figure 32. Existence of a control mechanism for safety requirements

vers la section précédente
vers la section suivante
 
 
Le Portail d'information - Médicaments essentiels et produits de santé a été conçu et est maintenu par l'ONG Human Info. Dernière mise à jour: le 5 novembre 2014