Essential Drugs Monitor No. 031 (2002)
(2002; 72 pages) [French] [Spanish] Voir le document au format PDF
Table des matières
Afficher le documentEssential Drugs Monitor
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenuEditorial
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenuConflict of Interest
Afficher le documentLetter from the Editor
Fermer ce répertoireNews Desk
Afficher le documentCalls for stronger consumer voice at conference on medicines and media
Afficher le documentRegulating drug promotion in Europe: meeting debates way forward
Afficher le documentAlliance protects rights to genetic resources
Afficher le documentRussia acts to curb counterfeits
Afficher le documentISDB defines genuinely innovative drugs
Afficher le documentDelhi: commitment to continuing pharmacy education
Afficher le documentDrug companies employ many more staff for marketing than R&D
Afficher le documentWorld Consumer Rights Day
Afficher le documentUS groups criticise magazine's special issue on health
Afficher le documentAustralia reports on a decade of quality use
Afficher le documentAdverse reactions to drugs increase
Afficher le documentLearning how to get RUD messages across to communities
Afficher le documentUN initiative evaluates HIV medicines
Afficher le documentConference promotes regional collaboration in SAARC countries
Afficher le documentTackling antimicrobial resistance
Afficher le documentStudy on research and development costs questioned
Afficher le documentWHO at work in Afghanistan
Afficher le documentNetscan, Meetings & Courses
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenuResearch
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenuDrug Promotion
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenuNational Drug Policy
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenuAccess
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenuRational Use
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenuAccess
 

Drug companies employ many more staff for marketing than R&D

BRAND-NAME drug makers in the United States employ 81% more people in their marketing departments than in their research and development (R&D) departments. And the "gap has been growing" over the past few years, according to a study by Boston University School of Public Health1. Researchers found that drug companies employed 48,527 staff in their R&D departments in 2000, down from 49,409 in 1995, while employment in their marketing departments increased from 55,348 to 87,810 during the same period. According to the study, the additional 32,000 marketing department employees were "mainly" sales representatives who promote drugs to doctors and Health Maintenance Organizations.


At work in a pharmaceutical laboratory in the USA. But according to a recent study many more people are involved in marketing than research and development

Photo: WHO/PAHO/C. Gaggero


In 2000, drug makers employed 39% of their staff in marketing, 22% in R&D, 26% in production and 11% in administration, the study found. Brand-name prescription drug makers say that they focus on discovering new cures, and that Americans must continue paying high prices to support research. Their employment priorities offer evidence that neither claim is true, the study concludes.

For further information contact: Boston University School of Public Health, Health Reform Programme, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA.


Reference

1. Sagar A, Socolar D. Drug industry marketing staff soars while research staffing stagnates. Report. Boston University School of Public Health, December 2001.

vers la section précédente vers la section suivante
 

Dernière mise à jour: le 3 mai 2013