Quantitative methods of data collection using aggregate data, health facility indicators or drug utilization evaluation can tell us if there is a medicine use problem, the nature of the problem and its size. However, these methods do not tell us why there is a problem. Figure 6.1 shows some of the factors that influence drug use. Knowing why prescribers and patients act as they do, and which factors are influencing them, is essential to designing effective interventions to change behaviour and correct the problem. Qualitative methods are used to investigate the ‘why’ of prescriber and patient behaviour.
|
BOX 6.5 DRUG USE INDICATORS
WHO/INRUD drug use indicators for primary health-care facilities
Prescribing indicators:
Average number of drugs per encounter Percentage of drugs prescribed by generic name Percentage of encounters with an antibiotic prescribed Percentage of encounters with an injection prescribed Percentage of drugs prescribed from essential medicines list or formulary
Patient care indicators:
Average consultation time Average dispensing time Percentage of drugs actually dispensed Percentage of drugs adequately labelled Patients’ knowledge of correct doses
Facility indicators:
Availability of essential medicines list or formulary to practitioners Availability of standard treatment guidelines Availability of key drugs
Complementary drug use indicators:
Percentage of patients treated without drugs Average drug cost per encounter Percentage of drug cost spent on antibiotics Percentage of drug cost spent on injections Percentage of prescriptions in accordance with treatment guidelines Percentage of patients satisfied with the care they receive Percentage of health facilities with access to impartial drug information
Source: WHO (1993). This manual provides practical guidance on how to measure these indicators.
Selected indicators used in hospitals
Average number of days per hospital admission % drugs prescribed that are consistent with the hospital formulary list Average number of drugs per inpatient-day Average number of antibiotics per inpatient-day Average number of injections per inpatient-day Average drug cost per inpatient-day % surgical patients who receive appropriate surgical prophylaxis Number of antimicrobial sensitivity tests reported per hospital admission % of inpatients who experience morbidity as a result of a preventable ADR % of inpatients deaths as a result of a preventable ADR % of patients who report adequate post-operative pain control
Sources: Zimbabwe DTC manual (1999); Draft manual on How to investigate antimicrobial use in hospitals, MSH (1997), RPM, HRN-A-00-92-00059-13; Manual of indicators for drug use in Australian hospitals, NSW Therapeutic Assessment Group Inc.
|

Figure 6.1 Some factors influencing drug use
Source: INRUD materials from the WHO/INRUD Promoting Rational Drug Use Course.
Four methods to collect relevant information are briefly described and summarized in Table 6.4. Analysis generally requires the identification of common themes or patterns within the data to help explain the primary and secondary reasons underlying the incorrect use of drugs by the target groups (patients or prescribers). It should be noted here that the overall design of a qualitative study is a complex process and usually requires the input and expertise of a social scientist. A more detailed description of this type of investigation is therefore beyond the scope of this manual.
A focus group discussion is a group discussion lasting 1-2 hours on a certain topic, organized by the researcher. The group should consist of a small number (6-10) of homogeneous people, who share similar characteristics such as age, gender or type of work (for example, a group of prescribers or a group of mothers). A trained moderator encourages participants to reveal underlying opinions, attitudes and reasons for the problem being studied. The discussion is recorded, either on tape or by two observers, and analysed systematically to identify key themes and issues. Focus group discussions can be used by a DTC to identify a range of beliefs, opinions and motives of a target group, for example doctors, nurses, pharmacists, paramedical staff and patients.
The in-depth interview is an extended discussion between a respondent and a knowledgeable skilled interviewer. The discussion is flexible and often unstructured, allowing an interviewer to encourage the respondent to talk at length about a particular pre-defined topic of interest, which may include 10-30 related topics. The in-depth interview technique can be used to expand the results of a quantitative study by exploring the reasons underlying the behaviour of the persons responsible for drug use problems. It can also be used in evaluating the impact of an intervention to promote more rational drug use.
Table 6.4 Summary of qualitative methods
METHOD |
ADVANTAGES |
DISADVANTAGES |
Focus Group Discussion |
|
|
• < 2-hour recorded discussion • 6-10 non-random respondents • 2-4 discussions for each significanttarget population • Moderator leads discussion • Respondents have similar characteristics e.g. age, gender, social status • Discussion topics pre-defined • Informal, relaxed, ambient • Reveals beliefs, opinions and motives |
Inexpensive
Quick
Easy to organize
Identifies a range of beliefs
|
• Groups may not represent the largerpopulation • Successful outcome is very dependent on the skills of the moderator who must balance outspoken participants against shy ones. • Tape recorders may inhibit participants but a note-taker may miss some data |
In-depth Interviews |
|
|
• One-to-one extended interview • Questions are pre-determined but open-ended • Often covers up to 30 topics • Reveals beliefs, attitudes, and knowledge |
Can reveal unsought but significant data |
• May generate lots of data which are difficult to manage • Time-consuming and expensive • Bias due to respondent saying things to please the interviewer • Different interviewers may interview differently |
Structured Observation |
|
|
• Data collection instrument is structured • Observers are trained to blend into their surroundings • Observers are trained to record what they actually see • Useful for recording provider - patient interactions • Assesses actual behaviour |
Observes actual behaviour as opposed to stated behaviour, which may not be the same |
• May be time consuming and expensive • Observation may cause change in the behaviour of health workers • Different observers may observe differently |
Structured Questionnaires |
|
|
• Questions are standardized with afixed set of responses or options • Respondents are selected so as to represent the larger population • Useful for a large sample of respondents • Measures the frequency of attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge |
Can generalize the results to the wider population |
• Interviewers may ask questions and interpret answers incorrectly • Different interviewers may ask questions differently • Questions may be ambiguous • Respondents may give answers to please the interviewer |
The structured observation study method utilizes trained people to observe a series of encounters between health providers and patients, following a structured form or checklist. The observers record behaviours and impressions they witness during the encounters. In some studies, they may record a score, based upon a set of specially prepared indicators, for each observed interaction. In general 10-20 patient-provider encounters per facility in 10 facilities (or 10-20 encounters per prescriber/dispenser in the case of a single hospital department) are observed, but the exact number would depend on the study objectives. The structured observation method can be used to study behaviours such as the interactions between staff and patients (for example the quality of communication) or the giving of injections. The data can be used independently or as a supplement to other study methods.
Using a structured questionnaire involves the preparation of a list of questions with a fixed set of responses or options in order to collect the desired information in a standard way from all respondents. The questionnaires may be administered by an interviewer or completed alone by respondents. Questions can focus on factual material, such as what a respondent knows about standardized diarrhoea treatment. Alternatively, questions can focus on a respondent’s attitudes, opinions and beliefs about the subject matter. Ideally the respondents are chosen randomly and the number will depend on the objectives of the study. The questionnaire method can be used by a DTC to quantify the frequency of attitudes, beliefs and knowledge about medicine use.