Drug and Therapeutics Committees - A Practical Guide
(2003; 155 pages) [French] [Spanish] Voir le document au format PDF
Table des matières
Afficher le documentAcronyms and abbreviations
Afficher le documentPreface
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu1. Introduction
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu2.Structure and organization of a drug and therapeutics committee
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu3. Managing the formulary process
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu4.Assessing new medicines
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu5.Ensuring medicine safety and quality
Fermer ce répertoire6.Tools to investigate the use of medicines
Afficher le document6.1 Stepwise approach to investigating the use of medicines
Afficher le document6.2 Analysis of aggregate medicine use data
Afficher le document6.3 WHO/INRUD drug use indicators for health facilities
Afficher le document6.4 Qualitative methods to investigate causes of problems of medicine use
Afficher le document6.5 Drug use evaluation (DUE) (drug utilization review)
Afficher le documentAnnex 6.1 Defined daily doses (DDD) of some common medicines
Afficher le documentAnnex 6.2 DUE criteria on data collection form for amikacin
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu7.Promoting the rational use of medicines
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu8.Antimicrobials and injections
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu9. Getting started
Afficher le documentGlossary1
Afficher le documentReferences
Afficher le documentFurther reading
Afficher le documentUseful addresses and websites
Afficher le documentBack cover
 

6.4 Qualitative methods to investigate causes of problems of medicine use

Quantitative methods of data collection using aggregate data, health facility indicators or drug utilization evaluation can tell us if there is a medicine use problem, the nature of the problem and its size. However, these methods do not tell us why there is a problem. Figure 6.1 shows some of the factors that influence drug use. Knowing why prescribers and patients act as they do, and which factors are influencing them, is essential to designing effective interventions to change behaviour and correct the problem. Qualitative methods are used to investigate the ‘why’ of prescriber and patient behaviour.

BOX 6.5 DRUG USE INDICATORS

WHO/INRUD drug use indicators for primary health-care facilities

Prescribing indicators:

Average number of drugs per encounter
Percentage of drugs prescribed by generic name
Percentage of encounters with an antibiotic prescribed
Percentage of encounters with an injection prescribed
Percentage of drugs prescribed from essential medicines list or formulary


Patient care indicators:

Average consultation time
Average dispensing time
Percentage of drugs actually dispensed
Percentage of drugs adequately labelled
Patients’ knowledge of correct doses


Facility indicators:

Availability of essential medicines list or formulary to practitioners
Availability of standard treatment guidelines
Availability of key drugs


Complementary drug use indicators:

Percentage of patients treated without drugs
Average drug cost per encounter
Percentage of drug cost spent on antibiotics
Percentage of drug cost spent on injections
Percentage of prescriptions in accordance with treatment guidelines
Percentage of patients satisfied with the care they receive
Percentage of health facilities with access to impartial drug information


Source: WHO (1993). This manual provides practical guidance on how to measure these indicators.

Selected indicators used in hospitals

Average number of days per hospital admission
% drugs prescribed that are consistent with the hospital formulary list
Average number of drugs per inpatient-day
Average number of antibiotics per inpatient-day
Average number of injections per inpatient-day
Average drug cost per inpatient-day
% surgical patients who receive appropriate surgical prophylaxis
Number of antimicrobial sensitivity tests reported per hospital admission
% of inpatients who experience morbidity as a result of a preventable ADR
% of inpatients deaths as a result of a preventable ADR
% of patients who report adequate post-operative pain control

Sources: Zimbabwe DTC manual (1999); Draft manual on How to investigate antimicrobial use in hospitals, MSH (1997), RPM, HRN-A-00-92-00059-13; Manual of indicators for drug use in Australian hospitals, NSW Therapeutic Assessment Group Inc.


Figure 6.1 Some factors influencing drug use

Source: INRUD materials from the WHO/INRUD Promoting Rational Drug Use Course.


Four methods to collect relevant information are briefly described and summarized in Table 6.4. Analysis generally requires the identification of common themes or patterns within the data to help explain the primary and secondary reasons underlying the incorrect use of drugs by the target groups (patients or prescribers). It should be noted here that the overall design of a qualitative study is a complex process and usually requires the input and expertise of a social scientist. A more detailed description of this type of investigation is therefore beyond the scope of this manual.

A focus group discussion is a group discussion lasting 1-2 hours on a certain topic, organized by the researcher. The group should consist of a small number (6-10) of homogeneous people, who share similar characteristics such as age, gender or type of work (for example, a group of prescribers or a group of mothers). A trained moderator encourages participants to reveal underlying opinions, attitudes and reasons for the problem being studied. The discussion is recorded, either on tape or by two observers, and analysed systematically to identify key themes and issues. Focus group discussions can be used by a DTC to identify a range of beliefs, opinions and motives of a target group, for example doctors, nurses, pharmacists, paramedical staff and patients.

The in-depth interview is an extended discussion between a respondent and a knowledgeable skilled interviewer. The discussion is flexible and often unstructured, allowing an interviewer to encourage the respondent to talk at length about a particular pre-defined topic of interest, which may include 10-30 related topics. The in-depth interview technique can be used to expand the results of a quantitative study by exploring the reasons underlying the behaviour of the persons responsible for drug use problems. It can also be used in evaluating the impact of an intervention to promote more rational drug use.

Table 6.4 Summary of qualitative methods

METHOD

ADVANTAGES

DISADVANTAGES

Focus Group Discussion

   

• < 2-hour recorded discussion
• 6-10 non-random respondents
• 2-4 discussions for each significanttarget population
• Moderator leads discussion
• Respondents have similar characteristics e.g. age, gender, social status
• Discussion topics pre-defined
• Informal, relaxed, ambient
• Reveals beliefs, opinions and motives

Inexpensive

Quick

Easy to organize

Identifies a range of beliefs

• Groups may not represent the largerpopulation
• Successful outcome is very dependent on the skills of the moderator who must balance outspoken participants against shy ones.
• Tape recorders may inhibit participants but a note-taker may miss some data

In-depth Interviews

   

• One-to-one extended interview
• Questions are pre-determined but open-ended
• Often covers up to 30 topics
• Reveals beliefs, attitudes, and knowledge

Can reveal unsought but significant data

• May generate lots of data which are difficult to manage
• Time-consuming and expensive
• Bias due to respondent saying things to please the interviewer
• Different interviewers may interview differently

Structured Observation

   

• Data collection instrument is structured
• Observers are trained to blend into their surroundings
• Observers are trained to record what they actually see
• Useful for recording provider - patient interactions
• Assesses actual behaviour

Observes actual behaviour as opposed to stated behaviour, which may not be the same

• May be time consuming and expensive
• Observation may cause change in the behaviour of health workers
• Different observers may observe differently

Structured Questionnaires

   

• Questions are standardized with afixed set of responses or options
• Respondents are selected so as to represent the larger population
• Useful for a large sample of respondents
• Measures the frequency of attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge

Can generalize the results to the wider population

• Interviewers may ask questions and interpret answers incorrectly
• Different interviewers may ask questions differently
• Questions may be ambiguous
• Respondents may give answers to please the interviewer

The structured observation study method utilizes trained people to observe a series of encounters between health providers and patients, following a structured form or checklist. The observers record behaviours and impressions they witness during the encounters. In some studies, they may record a score, based upon a set of specially prepared indicators, for each observed interaction. In general 10-20 patient-provider encounters per facility in 10 facilities (or 10-20 encounters per prescriber/dispenser in the case of a single hospital department) are observed, but the exact number would depend on the study objectives. The structured observation method can be used to study behaviours such as the interactions between staff and patients (for example the quality of communication) or the giving of injections. The data can be used independently or as a supplement to other study methods.

Using a structured questionnaire involves the preparation of a list of questions with a fixed set of responses or options in order to collect the desired information in a standard way from all respondents. The questionnaires may be administered by an interviewer or completed alone by respondents. Questions can focus on factual material, such as what a respondent knows about standardized diarrhoea treatment. Alternatively, questions can focus on a respondent’s attitudes, opinions and beliefs about the subject matter. Ideally the respondents are chosen randomly and the number will depend on the objectives of the study. The questionnaire method can be used by a DTC to quantify the frequency of attitudes, beliefs and knowledge about medicine use.

vers la section précédente vers la section suivante
 

Dernière mise à jour: le 3 mai 2013