Injection Use and Practices in Uganda - EDM Research Series No. 014
(1994; 54 pages) Voir le document au format PDF
Table des matières
Afficher le documentACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu1. INTRODUCTION
Fermer ce répertoire2. METHODOLOGY
Afficher le document2.1 Sampling frame
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu2.2 User-oriented methods
Afficher le document2.3 Provider-oriented methods
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu3. EXTENT OF INJECTION USE
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu4. HYGIENE OF INJECTION PRACTICE
Afficher le document5. POPULARITY OF INJECTIONS
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Afficher le documentREFERENCES
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenuLIST OF APPENDICES
Afficher le documentOTHER DOCUMENTS IN THE DAP RESEARCH SERIES
 

2.3 Provider-oriented methods

Data were gathered through the use of open-ended questionnaires, a review of prescriptions and actual treatment received, and the observation of hygienic measures. The provider survey was mainly aimed at establishing the prevalence of injection use at provider facilities, evaluating the appropriateness of injection use, and determining the source and type of equipment used.

The provider study was strategically scheduled two months after the completion of the user survey to guide the identification of injection providers within the study communities. Based on the question in the household survey “Where was the last injection administered?” we were in a position to identify a variety of injection providers. In the urban communities it was common to identify more different categories than in the rural areas where health resources are restricted. In addition, not all providers identified were willing to participate in the study. Therefore, although it was originally our intention to select five different categories of providers in each community and 30 providers per region, this was not feasible. We finally managed to come up with 21 injection sources in Busoga and 16 in Ankole (see Table 2), The variety of injection providers included: government health units, private clinics, drugshops, itinerant injectionists, and home providers.

Table 2: Overview of type of providers included in study in Busoga and Ankole Regions, Uganda

Health facility

Busoga
(Eastern Uganda) n=21

Ankole
(Western Uganda) n=16

Government

 

2

 

Hospital

1

 
 

Health centre

4

 

NGO health centre

3

-

Private clinic

6

10

Non-formal providers

3

-

drug shops

-

46

Home providers

4

-

6 At the time of the observation, two of these providers did not administer any injections.

Data were also collected through observational methods - this was done in collaboration with two professionally trained medical doctors. Through a combination of observational and informal discussions, the medical doctors evaluated hygienic measures undertaken before, during, and after administering injections. In Busoga, evaluation of hygienic measures was based on both WHO and country specific guidelines developed by the UEDMP and MOH for use of injections (see Appendix 2), In Ankole, evaluation of hygienic measures was strictly based on the WHO guidelines.

The researchers also reviewed the prescribing pattern; this was done on the basis of patient lists filled in by the provider in the presence of the medical doctors (see Appendix 3). Here, 30 consecutive cases visiting a provider facility were registered, specifying their age, sex, symptoms, forms of medication, and cost. Data gathered through this method was useful in establishing and understanding the nature of prescribing patterns at the various provider facilities.

 

vers la section précédente vers la section suivante
 

Dernière mise à jour: le 3 mai 2013