Pharmaceuticals and the Internet Drug Regulatory Authorities' Perspective - Joint NLN-WHI Workshop, 24-25 September 2001: References

Pharmaceuticals and the Internet Drug Regulatory Authorities' Perspective - Joint NLN-WHI Workshop, 24-25 September 2001
(2002; 80 pages)

Table des matières

	Executive Summary
	Overview of activities by the World Health Organization - Dr Lembit Rägo
	Overview of activities by the Nordic Council on Medicines - Dr Ola Westbye
	Country Experiences
		Sweden: Publication bias of clinical trials - Dr Juliette Säwe
		The Netherlands: Pharmaceuticals and e-commerce - Dr Hans Heuvelmans
		Denmark: Web site of the Institute for Rational Pharmacotherapy - Ms Karin Friis Bach
		Denmark: Danish Medicines Agency web site - Mr Karsten Jørgensen
		South Africa: The South African perspective on medicine regulation - Dr Wilbert Bannenberg
		Tunisia - Dr Amor Toumi
		Estonia - Dr Main Uusküla
		Bulgaria: Bulgarian Drug Agency - Rozalina Asenova Kulaksazova
	The Danish Consumer Council - Ms Margrethe Nielsen
	Swedish Industry Association - Dr Håkan Mandahl
	Introduction to discussion points - Dr Lembit Rägo
	Quality aspects - Dr Ola Westbye
	Pilot study on drug regulatory web sites: Current status and future challenges - Ms Elodie Jambert
	The WHO model web site for drug regulatory authorities - Dr Lembit Rägo, Ms Elodie Jambert, Mr Jorg Hetzke
	Concluding discussion
	Annexes
		Annex 1. List of Participants
		Annex 2. List of DRA web sites
	References
	Back cover

References

1. Fiftieth World Health Assembly. Resolution WHA50.4, May 1997.

2. Fifty-first World Health Assembly. Resolution WHA51.9, 16 May 1998. Available online: http://www.who.int/gb/EB_WHA/PDF/WHA51/ear9.pdf.

3. World Health Organization. Medical products and the Internet: A guide to finding reliable information. Regulatory Support Series No. 8. 1999. (WHO/EDM/QSM/99.4). Available online: http://www.who.int/medicines/library/qsm/who-edm-qsm-99-4/who-edm-qsm-99-4.htm.

4. Capp, C. UN agency urges control for drug domain names. Lancet, 2001, 358(9285).

5. Declaration of Helsinki (new version). Available online: http://www.wma.net/.

6. Europa, European Commission. Draft guidelines on quality criteria for health related websites. 2001. Available online: http://europa.eu.int/information_society/eeurope/ehealth/quality/draft_guidelines/index_en.htm.

7. International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Associations. IFPMA code of Pharmaceutical marketing practices. Addendum 1. 1994. Available online: http://www.ifpma.org/ifpma4.html.

8. Greer, T., Holinga, D., Kindel, C., Netznik, M. An educators’ guide to credibility and web evaluation. Why evaluate web information? EPS 304/Spring, 1999. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Updated May 1999. Available online: http://lrs.ed.uiuc.edu/wp/.

9. Virginia Tech University Libraries. Evaluating Internet information. 1999, updated July 27, 2001. Available online: http://www.lib.vt.edu/research/libinst/idle/evaluating.html.

10. Health Summit Working Group. Criteria for assessing the quality of health information on the Internet - policy paper. 2000. Available online: http://hitiweb.mitretek.org/docs/policy.html.

11. Centrale santé. Net scoring^®: Criteria to assess the quality of health Internet information. Version 3. 2000, updated July 2001. Available online: http://www.churouen.fr/netscoring/netscoringeng.html.

12. Kim, P., Eng, T.R., Deering, M.J., Maxfield, A. Published criteria for evaluation of health related web sites: Review. British Medical Journal, 1999, 318:647-9 (6 March).

13. McLachlan, K. WWW cyberguide ratings for content evaluation. 1999. Available online: http://www.cyberbee.com/guide1.html.

14. Schrock, K. How to separate the wheat from the chaff: How to tell the good sites from the bad. 1998. Available online: http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/chaff.html.

15. Grassian, E. Thinking critically about World Wide Web resources. University of California at Los Angeles, College Library Help Guides. 1995, updated September 2000. Available online: http://www.library.ucla.edu/libraries/college/help/critical/index.htm.

16. Elkordy, A. Evaluating web-based resources: A practical perspective. TheLearningSite. Updated June 2000. Available online: http://www.thelearningsite.net/cyberlibrarian/elibraries/eval.html.

17. University of Southern Maine Library. Checklist for evaluating web resources. Updated November 2000. Available online: http://library.usm.maine.edu/guides/webeval.html.