Guidelines for Clinical Research on Acupuncture
(1995; 68 pages)
Table des matières
Afficher le documentForeword
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu1. Introduction
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu2. Glossary
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu3. Goals and objectives of the guidelines
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu4. General considerations
Fermer ce répertoire5. Research methodology
Afficher le documentLiterature review
Afficher le documentTerminology and technology
Afficher le documentInvestigators
Afficher le documentClinical research design and rational use of acupuncture
Afficher le documentRandomized controlled clinical trial design
Afficher le documentProtocol development
Afficher le documentResearch knowledge
Afficher le documentCase report forms
Afficher le documentData management
Afficher le documentEthics review board
Afficher le documentStatistical analysis
Afficher le documentMonitoring of studies
Afficher le documentReporting
Afficher le documentImplementation
Afficher le documentConclusions
Afficher le document6. Using the guidelines
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenuAnnexes
Afficher le documentBibliography
Afficher le documentSelected WHO publications of related interest
Afficher le documentBack cover
 

Monitoring of studies

A formal procedure for the systematic monitoring of a research project or programme will greatly contribute to its success. Monitoring should be done throughout the period of implementation, and cease only at completion.

Because the therapeutic effect of acupuncture is often observed to continue for a period of time after the completion of a course of treatment, it is recommended that follow-up assessment of subjects should be conducted, particularly in exploratory protocols. The follow-up time may depend on the duration of effects of acupuncture. Inappropriately long or short follow-up times can skew results.

The following elements of the programme or project should be examined: goals, conformity of protocols with goals, progress of the research towards intended goals, and the impact of the research.

The outcome of the study should be evaluated with regard to:

1. the condition of the patient before treatment;

2. the progress of the patient’s disease stated in terms of both the objective observation made by the investigator or assessor and the patient’s own assessment; and

3. any adverse event that may have occurred during the study.

vers la section précédente vers la section suivante
 

Dernière mise à jour: le 3 mai 2013