Medicines and the New Economic Environment
(1998; 252 pages) [Spanish]
Table des matières
Afficher le documentTHE AUTHORS
Afficher le documentPREFACE
Afficher le documentINTRODUCTION
Fermer ce répertoireI. THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenuI.1. Opening Speech: Welfare State, Economic Policy and Health Services
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenuI.2. The Uruguay Round and Drugs
Fermer ce répertoireI.3. The Normalisation of the International Market for Pharmaceuticals: Future Impacts in Emerging Markets
Afficher le document1. THE GLOBAL CONTEXT
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenu2. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NORMS
Fermer ce répertoire3. FUTURE TRENDS IN A NORMALISED WORLD
Fermer ce répertoire3.1. Location of and control over production
Afficher le document3.1.1. A synthesis of the structure of production
Afficher le document3.1.2. What model is the international market heading for?
Afficher le document3.1.3. Options for local producers in emerging countries
Afficher le document3.2. International trade
Afficher le document4. THE STEPS TO FOLLOW
Afficher le documentREFERENCES
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenuII. THE REFORM OF HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenuIII. A CHANGING PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY
Ouvrir ce répertoire et afficher son contenuIV. SYNTHESIS AND FORECASTS
Afficher le documentBIBLIOTECA CIVITAS ECONOMÍA Y EMPRESA
Afficher le documentBACK COVER
 
3.1.1. A synthesis of the structure of production

The core points are:

• Emerging countries still on the whole have many firms manufacturing pharmaceuticals. Most of them are small/medium sized enterprises, survive entirely through the production of products which were patented in earlier years, have quite fragile financial structures, and compete quite strongly among themselves (i.e. within each country).

• State owned enterprises still operate in some emerging countries, but their influence is limited compared with the position occupied by state-run manufacturing firms in other industrial sectors.

• There is still very little R&D carried out in emerging countries. That which does take place often does not reach a «critical mass» sufficient to hold out the promise of results.

• Though the innovative pharmaceutical firms in these markets may be few in number, their market share tends to be substantial.

As noted earlier, foreign direct investment in emerging countries is not showing an expansionist tendency. The factors which stimulated it in the past (local content regulations; rules forbidding imports, or posing severe obstacles to them; measures limiting markets to generics) are precisely those whose weight has been significantly weakened by the new economic environment. There are only two things which might encourage foreign direct investment in the future. First, if really important savings in production costs were to exist which could attract foreign direct investment to emerging countries. This does not seem likely. R&D requires not only major investments, but also a «culture» which cannot be developed quickly. Even if there strong financial incentives were introduced, it is hard to imagine that a relocation of R&D based activities towards emerging countries could occur in the short or medium term. Second, the necessity of having a foothold in fresh markets, especially some of those in Asia. A few instances may be cited, such as the notable establishment of French innovative pharmaceutical firms in Vietnam, and the wave of joint ventures in China. Perhaps under the same outlook we could include foreign direct investment by individual firms seeking to consolidate sub-regional manufacturing/R&D bases (c/f Glaxo in Singapore). All the same, the global effect of such events does not seem likely to be the precursor of any appreciable shifts in industry structure.

vers la section précédente vers la section suivante
 

Dernière mise à jour: le 3 mai 2013