First-Year Experiences with the Interagency Guidelines for Drug Donations
(2000; 51 pages)
Índice de contenido
Ver el documentoAcknowledgements
Ver el documentoExecutive summary
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido1. Introduction
Cerrar esta carpeta2. Sources of information and study methodology
Ver el documentoGeneral overview of the method
Ver el documentoDefinition of respondents
Ver el documentoQuestionnaires
Ver el documentoDistribution of questionnaires
Ver el documentoInclusion criteria
Ver el documentoSample size
Ver el documentoData analysis
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido3. Dissemination and uptake of the Guidelines
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido4. Basic characteristics of drug donations
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido5. Practical benefits as a result of the Guidelines
Ver el documento6. Drug donations which were hampered, delayed or cancelled
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido7. Experiences and opinions regarding the 12-month shelf-life requirement
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido8. Other suggestions to improve the Guidelines
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido9. How could donation practice be further improved?
Ver el documento10. Summary of recommendations
Ver el documento11. Postscript
Ver el documentoReferences
 

Inclusion criteria

A total of 172 responses to questionnaires was returned, 34 of which are not included in the analysis for the following reasons. First, 18 respondents had never seen or read the Guidelines. For those who provided an address a copy of the Guidelines was sent with a further questionnaire requesting that it be filled in and returned; some complied with this request. Four pharmaceutical companies returned forms that were not filled in either because "The Company doesn't give donations" or because there was "No point in filling in the questionnaire as the company has its own donation policy". E-mail correspondence from a pharmaceutical company representative started with "We do not use your Guidelines" and continued with "We have our own guidelines". When asked gently if it was possible to see a copy, the representative replied "This guideline is an internal document, and therefore not subject to external distribution". Lastly, 14 largely identical replies from field offices of one organization were consolidated into one donor and one recipient reply. Data from the remaining 138 questionnaires were entered in the database and analysed.

Ir a la sección anterior Ir a la siguiente sección
 

Última actualización: le 3 mayo 2013