Globalization and Access to Drugs - Health Economics and Drugs Series, No. 007
(1998; 97 pages) [French] [Spanish] Ver el documento en el formato PDF
Índice de contenido
Ver el documentoAcknowledgements
Ver el documentoAbbreviations and acronyms
Cerrar esta carpetaPART I: GLOBALIZATION AND ACCESS TO DRUGS: IMPLICATIONS OF THE WTO/TRIPS AGREEMENT
Ver el documentoExecutive summary
Ver el documentoIntroduction
Cerrar esta carpeta1. Brief historical background to the international trading system
Ver el documento1.1 The simultaneous creation of the GATT, the IMF and the World Bank
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido1.2 The objectives, nature and functioning of the GATT
Cerrar esta carpeta1.3 The Uruguay Round and the creation of the WTO
Ver el documentoThe new global economic environment
Ver el documentoLong and difficult negotiations
Ver el documentoThe results of the Uruguay Round: strengthening and enlargement of the multilateral trade system
Ver el documentoHow does the WTO differ from the GATT?
Ver el documento1.4 The protection of intellectual property rights before the WTO
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido2. Reading the TRIPS Agreement from the perspective of access to drugs
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido3. Conclusions: issues at stake and constraints on access to drugs
Ver el documentoDefinitions and terminology4
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoSelected bibliography5
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoPART II: PRESENTATIONS AT THE AD HOC WORKING GROUP ON THE REVISED DRUG STRATEGY HELD IN GENEVA ON 13 OCTOBER 1998
Ver el documentoOther documents in the DAP - Health Economics and Drugs Series
Ver el documentoBack cover
 
The new global economic environment

At the beginning of the 1980s, it became apparent that the General Agreement was no longer so well adapted to the realities of trade as it had been in the 1950s. The complexity and volume of world trade were now very different from what they had been 40 years earlier. As the globalization of the economy progressed, international investments saw an unprecedented growth, and trade in services - not covered by the GATT rules - began to be a major interest for more and more countries, and was closely bound up with the increase in global trade in goods.

The GATT rules were also deemed inadequate in other ways: in the agriculture sector, for example, where the loopholes in the multilateral system were widely exploited and where attempts at liberalization were essentially in vain - and in the field of textiles and clothing, where an exception to the normal GATT areas of influence had been negotiated in the form of the Multifibre Arrangement (MFA). The institutional structure of the GATT and its system for the settlement of disputes were also becoming sources of concern. All these factors were enough to convince GATT Members that a renewed effort should be made to strengthen and enlarge the multilateral system.

Ir a la sección anterior Ir a la siguiente sección
 

Última actualización: le 3 mayo 2013