Guidelines for Evaluating an Essential Drugs Programme
(64 pages) Ver el documento en el formato PDF
Índice de contenido
Ver el documentoINTRODUCTION
Ver el documentoPROCEDURES FOR EVALUATION OF AN ACTION PROGRAMME ON ESSENTIAL DRUGS (APED)
Ver el documentoEXECUTIVE SUMMARY: OVERALL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Ver el documento1. SUMMARY BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON COUNTRY AND HEALTH CARE SYSTEM1
Ver el documento2. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE GENERAL FEATURES OF THE APED PROGRAMME
Ver el documento3. ECONOMIC AND SOCIOECONOMIC ASPECTS OF THE APED PROGRAMME
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido4. ANALYSIS OF EFFICIENCY
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido5. ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTIVENESS
Cerrar esta carpeta6. MANAGING THE ESSENTIAL DRUG PROGRAMME
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido6.1 PROGRAMME ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido6.2 BUDGETING, FINANCING AND COSTING
Cerrar esta carpeta6.3 MONITORING
Ver el documento6.3.1 INDICATORS
Ver el documento6.3.2 PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS OF DATA
Ver el documento6.3.3 PRESENTATION AND USE OF MONITORING RESULTS
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido7. ASSESSMENT OF INPUTS OF THE GOVERNMENT AND DONORS
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido8. PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE
Ver el documento9. REFERENCES
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoMANUAL FOR CONDUCTING AN EVALUATION OF AIM ACTION PROGRAMME ON ESSENTIAL DRUGS (APED)
 

6.3.1 INDICATORS

The chosen indicators should have the following characteristics:

a) They should cover the different aspects of implementation and operation of the programme. The indicators should provide information on the efficiency (chapter 4) and effectiveness (chapter 5) of the programme.

b) They should be simple, and the number of indicators should be limited. The idea is not to have indicators which describes the total universe of the programme, but rather a few indicators which produce the information necessary for decision-making.

c) They should be cost-effective. Just as it is not always necessary to have a separate indicator for each aspect of the programme, it is also not necessary to have full coverage of any particular factor. For example, a sample at a few health centers can be sufficient instead of collecting data continuously at every health center.

d) They should be adapted to the manpower and financial resources of the country and, in particular, of the programme. Monitoring should not be based on complex and expensive data collection techniques that would be difficult to apply in the country on a continuous basis.

Ir a la sección anterior Ir a la siguiente sección
 

Última actualización: le 3 mayo 2013