Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference of Drug Regulatory Authorities (ICDRA) - Berlin, Germany 25-29 April 1999
(1999; 102 pages) Ver el documento en el formato PDF
Índice de contenido
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoOpening Ceremony
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoGood regulatory practice
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoGood certification practice
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoCounterfeit drugs: challenges and solutions
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoCurrent issues in regulation and quality
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoInternational Conference on Harmonization: implementation and implications
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoDrug utilization studies
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoInternational Conference on Harmonization and the common technical document
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoKeynote address
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoGlobal and national efforts to reduce tobacco use
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoElectronic communication in the regulatory process
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoTransparency in monitoring the safety of medicines
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoPharmaceutical products for use in special groups
Cerrar esta carpetaNeed for Bioequivalence
Ver el documentoThe rationale for bioequivalence studies
Ver el documentoCan in vitro replace in vivo studies?
Ver el documentoApplication of requirements for in vivo studies
Ver el documentoRecommendations
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoAntimicrobial resistance: battling the bugs
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoSafety issues of plasma-derived medicinal products
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoHerbal medicines
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoRegulation and access to essential drugs
Ver el documentoParticipants
Ver el documentoBack cover
 

Can in vitro replace in vivo studies?

Dr M. AI-Saket, Jordan

The Drug Directorate at the Ministry of Health in Jordan is aware of the importance of bioequivalence studies as an essential requirement for drug registration to increase trade and the number of locally produced drugs. In 1986, the Drug Directorate adopted a policy of requesting bioequivalence studies for the following categories: sustained release products, enteric coated products, and low dissolution profile products.

In 1998, the Drug Directorate began implementation of regulations as a prerequisite to drug registration. The therapeutic efficacy of pharmaceutical formulations is governed by factors related to both the in vitro dissolution characteristics of the drug, and its in vivo bioavailablity. This inherent interdependency within the drug-patient biosystem is the major concern underlying the importance of in vitro/in vivo correlation studies.

The dissolution rate of a specific dosage form is essentially an arbitrary parameter that is very dependent on the methodology utilized in generating data. Changes in the type of apparatus, dissolution medium, agitation speed, etc., can modify dramatically the dissolution pattern. Therefore, unless it is demonstrated experimentally that the in vitro dissolution behaviour reflects the in vivo performance in humans, the data can be of no relevant value in predicting or passing any judgement on the clinical effectiveness of a drug product. In other words, the bioavailability implications of dissolution should never be accepted on faith; rather they must be proven through carefully designed in vitro/in vivo correlation studies.

Dissolution tests are usually used for the development of a new product, to assist with the determination of bioequivalence, and to assist in choosing a formulation. They may also serve to evaluate whether more clinical studies are needed to assess product bioavailabilty when no correlation exists. In general, it has been noted that for immediate release dosage forms a good level of correlation has been reported and the dissolution profiles were predictive of human bioavailability in many cases. For sustained release dosage forms the problem is much more complex.

In summary, there is a real need to develop dissolution tests that better predict in vivo performance of drug products. This could be achieved if the conditions in the gastrointestinal tract were successfully reconstructed in in vitro systems. The development of prognostic in vitro tests should lead not only to a reduction in the work needed for formulation development, but also in the number and size of clinical studies required, as well as to more meaningful quality assurance tests.

Ir a la sección anterior Ir a la siguiente sección
 

Última actualización: le 3 mayo 2013