Implications of the Doha Declaration on the Trips Agreement and Public Health - Health Economics and Drugs Series No. 012
(2002; 56 pages) [French] [Spanish] Ver el documento en el formato PDF
Índice de contenido
Ver el documentoForeword
Ver el documentoAcknowledgements
Ver el documentoAbbreviations and acronyms
Ver el documentoExecutive summary
Ver el documentoIntroduction
Ver el documentoScope
Ver el documentoThe role of TRIPS and IPRs
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoPublic health measures
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoFlexibility in TRIPS
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoMembers with insufficient or no manufacturing capacities
Ver el documentoTransfer of technology to LDCs
Ver el documentoExtension of transitional period for LDCs
Ver el documentoSpecial treatment under TRIPS
Ver el documentoLegal status of the Doha Declaration
Ver el documentoIssues not covered in the Declaration
Ver el documentoConclusions
Ver el documentoAnnex 1 - Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health
Ver el documentoAnnex 2 - Levels of development of pharmaceutical industry, by country
Ver el documentoReferences
 

The role of TRIPS and IPRs

Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health: Paragraphs 2 and 3

2. We stress the need for the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) to be part of the wider national and international action to address these problems.

3. We recognize that intellectual property protection is important for the development of new medicines. We also recognize the concerns about its effects on prices.

Paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Doha Declaration express the Members´ view with regard to the role of TRIPS and IPRs in the context of public health.

Paragraph 2 stresses “the need for” the TRIPS Agreement “to be part of the wider national and international action to address these problems”. This statement, read in conjunction with paragraph 4, seems to indicate that the extent to which the Agreement is part of the problem or of the solution to public health needs, crucially depends on the way in which the Agreement is implemented and interpreted. This paragraph suggests that intellectual property rights are one but not the only factor that affects public health and, in particular, access to drugs26.

26 Some analyses, particularly by the pharmaceutical industry, have stressed that access to drugs is fundamentally determined by non-IPR factors, such as health infrastructure and medical services. See, e.g., IIPI. See also the US submission to the Council of TRIPS (IP/C/W/340, 14 March 2002).

The first sentence of paragraph 3 alludes to the “important” role of intellectual property protection “for the development of new medicines”. Unlike other preambular paragraphs, this one specifically refers to “medicines”27. This statement - welcomed by the pharmaceutical industry - is balanced by the second sentence, which recognizes one of the troubling effects of patent protection: its impact on prices.

27 The crucial role of patents in inciting research in drug development has been the subject of extensive academic work, See, e.g. Kettler, 2002.

The patent system is designed to enable patent holders to set prices higher than those that would be obtained in a competitive market. The Doha Declaration recognizes that the high prices of medicines caused by patent protection are part of the grave problems that afflict developing countries and LDCs and is a “concern” that needs to be addressed. The consensus achieved on patent protection’s impact on drug prices may be considered one of the major political achievements of the developing countries in the Doha Ministerial Declaration.

 

Ir a la sección anterior Ir a la siguiente sección
 

Última actualización: le 3 mayo 2013