Effective Drug Regulation - A Multicountry Study and Annex 1: Guide for Data Collection to Assess Drug Regulatory Performance
(2002; 187 pages) Ver el documento en el formato PDF
Índice de contenido
Ver el documentoACRONYMS
Ver el documentoPREFACE
Ver el documentoACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Ver el documentoEXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido1. DRUG REGULATION: OBJECTIVES AND ISSUES
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido2. MULTICOUNTRY STUDY ON EFFECTIVE DRUG REGULATION
Cerrar esta carpeta3. PROFILE OF THE COUNTRIES
Ver el documento3.1 GENERAL BACKGROUND
Ver el documento3.2 POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT
Ver el documento3.3 PHARMACEUTICAL SECTOR ENVIRONMENT
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido4. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido5. REGULATORY CAPACITY
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido6. LICENSING OF MANUFACTURING, DISTRIBUTION AND RETAIL SALE
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido7. INSPECTION AND SURVEILLANCE
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido8. PRODUCT ASSESSMENT AND REGISTRATION
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido9. CONTROL OF DRUG PROMOTION AND ADVERTISING
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido10. DRUG QUALITY CONTROL LABORATORY
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido11. ASSESSING REGULATORY PERFORMANCE
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido12. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EFFECTIVE DRUG REGULATION
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoANNEX 1: GUIDE FOR DATA COLLECTION TO ASSESS DRUG REGULATORY PERFORMANCE
 

3.3 PHARMACEUTICAL SECTOR ENVIRONMENT

The variety and size of pharmaceutical activities in a country determine the type and burden of responsibility which the DRA must bear. Figures 3.4a and 3.4b indicate the size of the pharmaceutical sector in the 10 countries, while Figure 3.5 shows the number of registered products in each country.

From Figure 3.4a it is clear that Australia has a large number of manufacturers to regulate, as do Malaysia and the Netherlands. This means that these countries will require a larger number of GMP inspectors compared with Cyprus, Estonia and Uganda, countries with a relatively smaller domestic manufacturing industry.

Figure 3.4b, on the other hand, shows that the total number of drug suppliers (importers and wholesalers) and retail outlets to be regulated are higher in Malaysia and Venezuela, followed by Australia, than in countries such as Cyprus, Estonia, Uganda and Zimbabwe.

This means that Australia, Malaysia and Venezuela have to invest significant human and financial resources in inspections of the supply channels in their respective countries in order to ensure compliance with the requirements of good distribution practice (GDP) and the provisions of the pharmaceutical laws. Arranging human resources and schedules for inspection is even more arduous when the distribution outlets are widely dispersed through the rural areas.


Figure 3.4a Number of pharmaceutical manufacturers*

* Cuba, Cyprus and Tunisia (1997), the rest (1998). Data for Australia include producers of prescription ad + OTC products (including complementary medicines and medical devices).


Figure 3.4b Number of pharmaceutical suppliers and retail pharmacies*

* Cyprus and the Netherlands (1997), the rest (1998).

The number of registered drugs, as shown in Figure 3.5, is higher in Australia and Malaysia than in Cuba, Estonia, Uganda and Zimbabwe. The larger the number of drugs on the market, the greater the burden of conducting systematic evaluation and re-evaluation of the safety and efficacy of drugs, carrying out post-marketing quality surveillance and monitoring ADR in drugs available on the market.


Figure 3.5 Number of registered pharmaceutical products for human use*

* Netherlands (1996), Tunisia (1997), others (1998)

** The number of products registered with the TGA is approximately 60 000 items (including prescription drugs, OTC medicines, complementary medicines and medical devices). Only approximate data for human pharmaceutical products are shown here.

 

Ir a la sección anterior Ir a la siguiente sección
 

Última actualización: le 24 abril 2012