Impact of a Short Course in Pharmacotherapy for Undergraduate Medical Students: An International Multicentre Study - EDM Research Series No. 017
(1995; 23 pages) Ver el documento en el formato PDF
Índice de contenido
Ver el documentoSummary
Ver el documentoIntroduction
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoMaterials and methods
Cerrar esta carpetaResults
Ver el documentoRetention effect
Ver el documentoTransfer effect
Ver el documentoKnowledge on drug treatment of pain
Ver el documentoResults per medical school
Ver el documentoIndependent scoring of results
Ver el documentoQuestionnaire
Ver el documentoDiscussion and conclusion
Ver el documentoAnnex 1: Retention effect
Ver el documentoAnnex 2: Transfer effect
Ver el documentoAnnex 3: Knowledge on treatment of pain
Ver el documentoReferences
Ver el documentoOther documents in the DAP Research Series
Ver el documentoDAP Research Series No. 17
 

Retention effect

The mean scores for each of the six basic steps of the problem solving routine of problem A at T1, T2 and T3 are given in Annex 1a and visualised in Figure 1. At T1 there was no difference between study and control groups for each of the six steps in the problem-solving routine, with a total mean score 6.76 versus 7.14 (maximum score 3 points per step, 18 in total). At T2 the study group showed significantly higher scores than the control group (11.88 vs 7.24). At T3 the study group again scored significantly higher on all steps compared to control students (12.23 vs 7.77), and also when compared to their own previous results at T1.

Results of the matched pair analysis for each of the six steps in problem A are given in Annex 1b, presenting the average increase in student scores in the study group between T1 and T2, and between T1 and T3, when compared with those in the control group.

Ir a la sección anterior Ir a la siguiente sección
 

Última actualización: le 3 mayo 2013