The study was conducted at Jinja Regional Referral Hospital (JRRH) and Nile Treatment Centre (NTC) both in Busoga region. A total of 200 respondents (109 from JRRH and 91 from NTC) participated in the study. Demographics were calculated for all the ARV users who participated in the study from adherence, exit and semi-structured interviews. Twenty six (37%) of the ARV users were male and 44 (63%) were female. Fifty-six per cent of the participants had been on ART for two years or less and the rest (44%) had been on ARVs for more than two years (Table 2).
Table 2: Length of time participants have been taking ARVs, by site
Duration taking ARVs (months) |
JRRH |
NTC |
Total |
| |
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
< 3 months |
|
0 |
4 |
11 |
4 |
6 |
3 - 6 |
4 |
11 |
14 |
39 |
18 |
25 |
7 - 12 |
13 |
37 |
5 |
14 |
18 |
25 |
13 - 18 |
3 |
9 |
3 |
8 |
6 |
8 |
19 - 24 |
3 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
25 - 30 |
2 |
6 |
2 |
6 |
4 |
6 |
31 - 36 |
2 |
6 |
2 |
6 |
4 |
6 |
37 - 42 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
43 + |
8 |
23 |
4 |
11 |
12 |
17 |
Total |
35 |
100 |
36 |
100 |
71 |
100 |
Of the 71 respondents interviewed, 40 (56%) had finished secondary education, 17 (24%) had completed primary education and 14 (20%) had completed tertiary education. The lowest educational level was seven years' schooling (Table 3).
Table 3: Educational status of study participants
Education Level |
Number who completed |
Percentage (%) |
Primary |
17 |
24 |
Secondary |
40 |
56 |
Tertiary |
14 |
20 |
Total |
71 |
100 |
While ARVs were provided free of charge at the public facility (JRRH), most patients (97%) at the private facility (NTC) reported a monthly expenditure of Ushs 5000 (US$ 3.00) in the form of user fees. Overall, 82% (58) of the patients at the two facilities incurred additional costs associated with obtaining or taking ARVs. Only 18 % (13) did not incur such additional costs (Table 4). There were no significant differences in the additional costs between the two facilities.
Table 4: Costs incurred by ARV users per month
ARV costs in Uganda shillings* |
JRRH N = 35 |
NTC N = 36 |
Total N = 71 |
| |
Percent |
Percent |
Percent |
<5000 |
97 |
0 |
48 |
>5000 <10000 |
3 |
97 |
51 |
10000+ |
0 |
3 |
1 |
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Other Costs |
|
|
|
No |
17 |
19 |
18 |
yes |
83 |
81 |
82 |
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
* US$ 1.00 = approx. 1700 Uganda shillings (Ushs)
The average distance travelled to the health facility was 20 km, with the minimum distance being 1 km and the maximum distance travelled 184 km. Distances were considered because they had implications for costs, which in the long run may affect adherence (Table 5).
Table 5: Distance travelled to the health facility by ARV users on each visit
Distance (km) |
JRRH |
NTC |
Total |
| |
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
1 - 10 |
24 |
69 |
18 |
50 |
42 |
59 |
11 - 20 |
3 |
9 |
3 |
8 |
6 |
8 |
21 - 30 |
2 |
6 |
4 |
11 |
6 |
8 |
31 - 40 |
4 |
11 |
2 |
6 |
6 |
8 |
41 - 50 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
8 |
4 |
6 |
51 + |
1 |
3 |
6 |
17 |
7 |
10 |
Total |
35 |
100 |
36 |
100 |
71 |
100 |
A considerable number of patients on treatment had to travel at least 10 km to the clinic which may also be a significant factor in relation to adherence. This implies that some of them had to travel by taxi or hire a bicycle, entailing extra cost for the client, while those who came from far away had no alternative but to shoulder the additional transport costs.