This is an issue on which all serious parties agree on the principles, but not necessarily on the content of the norms. Table 4 summarises the position in a certain number of emerging countries.
In production terms, one element stands out from the table while another underlies it. The theme which is evident is: what kind of good manufacturing practices are to be set? Among the national level, the standards set by WHO, and the levels achieved in the most advanced firms, there can be substantial differences. These necessarily are related to investment, technical capacity and the link between outlays to install and maintain equipment and professional practices, and the profits likely to be derived from the products made. The higher the standard of good manufacturing practices which is set, the more delicate (in all likelihood) will be the economic situation of the local small/medium sized enterprises (and perhaps also of larger local firms).
TABLE 4. - The good manufacturing practices and the quality of drugs sold
Country |
Good manufacturing practices |
Quality of drugs |
Brazil |
1993 survey that only 15 per cent of firms met the good manufacturing practices standards of WHO. In 1995 an inspection and monitoring programme was started. |
Roughly one half of drugs sold were of doubtful quality. |
Korea |
|
In 1995 conditions governing good clinical practice were introduced. |
Indonesia |
>40 per cent of firms do not meet the national good manufacturing practices. |
|
Malaysia |
|
1994: roughly 0,5 per cent of drugs were withdrawn from the market due to inferior quality. |
Morocco |
European good manufacturing practices are followed. |
|
Pakistan |
60 per cent of firms do not meet international standards. |
In 1995 a policy of withdrawing from the pharmaceutical register products of poor quality was initiated. |
Thailand |
40 per cent of firms do not meet national good manufacturing practices. |
|
The underlying theme has, in our opinion, broad ramifications even though (it would seem) the issue has not so far been subject to detailed analysis. The issue is: who designs and monitors the good manufacturing practices, and through what mechanisms? The process of normalising the world has acquired enormous force in recent years, associated above all with the wave of standards ISO 900014. It is worth highlighting that, within this process, ever more stress is laid on the decentralisation and privatisation of the work of inspection/auditing/issuance of certificates. Given that an acute problem in many emerging countries is precisely the weakness of professional bodies/State agencies of inspection, it is likely that the trend towards decentralisation/privatisation will be accentuated. The innovative pharmaceutical firms, or staff coming from them, are the most likely candidates for expansion into this market. Hence the dream of the industry gets ever closer - the day when it will be normalised and monitored from within rather than without. Such a turn of events would not necessarily be negative for emerging countries; but it would oblige their entrepreneurs to devote still more attention to working out how to transform at least a part of their production to innovative products.
14 See O'Brien regarding standards in the Andean countries.