Medicines and the New Economic Environment
(1998; 252 pages) [Spanish]
Índice de contenido
Ver el documentoTHE AUTHORS
Ver el documentoPREFACE
Ver el documentoINTRODUCTION
Cerrar esta carpetaI. THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoI.1. Opening Speech: Welfare State, Economic Policy and Health Services
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoI.2. The Uruguay Round and Drugs
Cerrar esta carpetaI.3. The Normalisation of the International Market for Pharmaceuticals: Future Impacts in Emerging Markets
Ver el documento1. THE GLOBAL CONTEXT
Cerrar esta carpeta2. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NORMS
Ver el documento2.1. The drive towards normalisation
Cerrar esta carpeta2.2. The empirical framework
Ver el documento2.2.1. The current structure of national markets
Ver el documento2.2.2. Patents
Ver el documento2.2.3. Prices
Ver el documento2.2.4. The good manufacturing practices (GMP) and the quality of pharmaceuticals
Ver el documento2.2.5. Generics
Ver el documento2.3. The significance of the empirical information
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenido3. FUTURE TRENDS IN A NORMALISED WORLD
Ver el documento4. THE STEPS TO FOLLOW
Ver el documentoREFERENCES
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoII. THE REFORM OF HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoIII. A CHANGING PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY
Abrir esta carpeta y ver su contenidoIV. SYNTHESIS AND FORECASTS
Ver el documentoBIBLIOTECA CIVITAS ECONOMÍA Y EMPRESA
Ver el documentoBACK COVER
 
2.2.4. The good manufacturing practices (GMP) and the quality of pharmaceuticals

This is an issue on which all serious parties agree on the principles, but not necessarily on the content of the norms. Table 4 summarises the position in a certain number of emerging countries.

In production terms, one element stands out from the table while another underlies it. The theme which is evident is: what kind of good manufacturing practices are to be set? Among the national level, the standards set by WHO, and the levels achieved in the most advanced firms, there can be substantial differences. These necessarily are related to investment, technical capacity and the link between outlays to install and maintain equipment and professional practices, and the profits likely to be derived from the products made. The higher the standard of good manufacturing practices which is set, the more delicate (in all likelihood) will be the economic situation of the local small/medium sized enterprises (and perhaps also of larger local firms).

TABLE 4. - The good manufacturing practices and the quality of drugs sold

Country

Good manufacturing practices

Quality of drugs

Brazil

1993 survey that only 15 per cent of firms met the good manufacturing practices standards of WHO. In 1995 an inspection and monitoring programme was started.

Roughly one half of drugs sold were of doubtful quality.

Korea

 

In 1995 conditions governing good clinical practice were introduced.

Indonesia

>40 per cent of firms do not meet the national good manufacturing practices.

 

Malaysia

 

1994: roughly 0,5 per cent of drugs were withdrawn from the market due to inferior quality.

Morocco

European good manufacturing practices are followed.

 

Pakistan

60 per cent of firms do not meet international standards.

In 1995 a policy of withdrawing from the pharmaceutical register products of poor quality was initiated.

Thailand

40 per cent of firms do not meet national good manufacturing practices.

 

The underlying theme has, in our opinion, broad ramifications even though (it would seem) the issue has not so far been subject to detailed analysis. The issue is: who designs and monitors the good manufacturing practices, and through what mechanisms? The process of normalising the world has acquired enormous force in recent years, associated above all with the wave of standards ISO 900014. It is worth highlighting that, within this process, ever more stress is laid on the decentralisation and privatisation of the work of inspection/auditing/issuance of certificates. Given that an acute problem in many emerging countries is precisely the weakness of professional bodies/State agencies of inspection, it is likely that the trend towards decentralisation/privatisation will be accentuated. The innovative pharmaceutical firms, or staff coming from them, are the most likely candidates for expansion into this market. Hence the dream of the industry gets ever closer - the day when it will be normalised and monitored from within rather than without. Such a turn of events would not necessarily be negative for emerging countries; but it would oblige their entrepreneurs to devote still more attention to working out how to transform at least a part of their production to innovative products.

14 See O'Brien regarding standards in the Andean countries.

Ir a la sección anterior Ir a la siguiente sección
 

Última actualización: le 3 mayo 2013