First-Year Experiences with the Interagency Guidelines for Drug Donations
(2000; 51 pages)
Table of Contents
View the documentAcknowledgements
View the documentExecutive summary
Open this folder and view contents1. Introduction
Close this folder2. Sources of information and study methodology
View the documentGeneral overview of the method
View the documentDefinition of respondents
View the documentQuestionnaires
View the documentDistribution of questionnaires
View the documentInclusion criteria
View the documentSample size
View the documentData analysis
Open this folder and view contents3. Dissemination and uptake of the Guidelines
Open this folder and view contents4. Basic characteristics of drug donations
Open this folder and view contents5. Practical benefits as a result of the Guidelines
View the document6. Drug donations which were hampered, delayed or cancelled
Open this folder and view contents7. Experiences and opinions regarding the 12-month shelf-life requirement
Open this folder and view contents8. Other suggestions to improve the Guidelines
Open this folder and view contents9. How could donation practice be further improved?
View the document10. Summary of recommendations
View the document11. Postscript
View the documentReferences
 

Inclusion criteria

A total of 172 responses to questionnaires was returned, 34 of which are not included in the analysis for the following reasons. First, 18 respondents had never seen or read the Guidelines. For those who provided an address a copy of the Guidelines was sent with a further questionnaire requesting that it be filled in and returned; some complied with this request. Four pharmaceutical companies returned forms that were not filled in either because "The Company doesn't give donations" or because there was "No point in filling in the questionnaire as the company has its own donation policy". E-mail correspondence from a pharmaceutical company representative started with "We do not use your Guidelines" and continued with "We have our own guidelines". When asked gently if it was possible to see a copy, the representative replied "This guideline is an internal document, and therefore not subject to external distribution". Lastly, 14 largely identical replies from field offices of one organization were consolidated into one donor and one recipient reply. Data from the remaining 138 questionnaires were entered in the database and analysed.

to previous section to next section
 

Last updated: May 3, 2013