WHO Drug Information Vol. 19, No. 2, 2005
(2005; 98 pages) View the PDF document
Table of Contents
Open this folder and view contentsBiomedicines Update
Close this folderSafety and Efficacy Issues
View the documentTiagabine: seizures in patients without a history of epilepsy
View the documentEffect of medroxyprogesterone on bone mineral density
View the documentTumour necrosis factor inhibitors: safety update
View the documentPimecrolimus and tacrolimus linked to cancer increase
View the documentErythropoietin: caution in cancer patients
View the documentOxcarbazepine: multi-organ hypersensitivity
View the documentDrotrecogin alfa: single organ dysfunction
View the documentDrotrecogin alfa: not indicated for paediatric sepsis
View the documentInterferon beta-1 a and hepatic injury
View the documentAvascular necrosis with interferon alfa-2b in chronic myelogenous leukaemia
View the documentHylan G-F 20: joint inflammation and pain
View the documentGalantamine and vascular events
View the documentRosuvastatin: revised start doses
View the documentNew kidney function test a better predictor of risk
View the documentStatins and peripheral neuropathy
View the documentAngioedema: still a problem with ACE inhibitors
View the documentMore advice on SSRI use
View the documentMillion Women Study: latest HRT data
View the documentTuberculin purified protein derivative (Mantoux) and serious allergic reactions
View the documentEzetimibe: hepatic, muscle, and pancreatic reactions
View the documentMefloquine: revised patient information
View the documentAtomoxatine and liver injury
View the documentGefitinib: failure to show survival in lung cancer
Open this folder and view contentsRegulatory Action and News
Open this folder and view contentsCurrent Topics
Open this folder and view contentsATC/DDD classification
Open this folder and view contentsRecent Publications and Sources of Information
Open this folder and view contentsThe International Pharmacopoeia
View the documentInternational Nonproprietary Names for Pharmaceutical Substances (INN)
 

Gefitinib: failure to show survival in lung cancer

United States of America - The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reported that a large clinical trial comparing gefitinib (Iressa®) with placebo in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who had failed other courses of cancer therapy showed no survival benefit. Patients currently taking gefitinib should consult their physicians as soon as possible; patients should not change their therapy without first consulting their physicians.

Alternative therapies are available. FDA has approved docetaxel (Taxotere®) and erlotinib (Tarceva®), both of which have been shown in studies to improve survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer whose cancer has progressed while on previous therapies. Pemetrexed (Alimta®) has received an accelerated approval based on the surrogate endpoint for this use but has not yet demonstrated any survival benefit.

FDA approved gefitinib in 2003 under the Agency’s accelerated approval program for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer who had failed two or more courses of chemotherapy. Gefitinib was approved because the data from clinical trials showed that it caused significant shrinkage in tumours in about 10% of patients, and this was thought likely to increase patients’ overall survival time.

After the approval of gefitinib, the manufacturer conducted a study in approximately 1700 patients to determine whether the drug would in fact prolong survival in comparison to patients taking placebo. The results announced indicate that the drug did not prolong survival. FDA will determine whether gefitinib should be withdrawn from the market or if other regulatory actions are appropriate after it has evaluated the recent study results.

Reference: FDA statement.(revised version). 17 December 2004. http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/

Spontaneous monitoring systems are useful in detecting signals of relatively rare, serious and unexpected adverse drug reactions. A signal is defined as "reported information on a possible causal relationship between an adverse event and a drug, the relationship being unknown or incompletely documented previously, more than a single report is required to generate a signal, depending upon . Usually the seriousness of the event and the quality of the information". All signals must be validated before any regulatory decision can be made.

 

to previous section to next section
 

Last updated: April 24, 2012