Fixed-Dose Combinations for HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria - Report of a Meeting Held 16-18 December 2003 Geneva
(2003; 199 pages) View the PDF document
Table of Contents
Open this folder and view contentsSummary: Observations and some ways forward
Open this folder and view contentsWelcome
Open this folder and view contentsFixed-dose combinations for tuberculosis: lessons learned from a clinical, formulation and regulatory perspective
Open this folder and view contentsProduct costs of fixed-dose combination tablets in comparison with separate dispensing and or co-blistering of antituberculosis drugs
Open this folder and view contentsFixed-dose combinations: artemisinin-based combination therapies for malaria treatment
Open this folder and view contentsDeveloping combinations of drugs for malaria examination of critical issues and lessons learnt
Open this folder and view contentsSafety and long-term effectiveness of generic fixed-dose formulations of nevirapine-based HAART amongst antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected patients in India
Open this folder and view contentsEffect of introduction of fixed-dose combinations on the drug supply chain: experiences from the field
Open this folder and view contentsEffect of fixed-dose combination (FDC) medications on adherence and treatment outcomes
Close this folderEffect of fixed-dose combination (FDC) drugs on development of clinical antimicrobial resistance: a review paper
View the documentExecutive summary
View the documentIntroduction
View the documentBiological basis for drug resistance to anti-TB, HIV/AIDS and malaria drugs
View the documentCombination drugs in the context of AMR
View the documentOvercoming clinical resistance using combinations: what is the evidencei?
View the documentFuture research needs
View the documentConclusion
View the documentSelected studies comparing combinations, FDCs, blister packs and monotherapy with regard to development of antimicrobial resistance
View the documentReferences
Open this folder and view contentsFixed-dose combination (FDC) drugs availability and use as a global public health necessity: intellectual property and other legal issues
Open this folder and view contentsPharmaceutical development and quality assurance of FDCs
View the documentAnnotated agenda
View the documentList of participants
 

Introduction

The emergence of previously unreported infectious diseases and the re-emergence of infectious disease thought to have been on the way to elimination has recently occupied the energies of scientists and policymakers1. Moreover, this increasing burden of disease must be viewed against the backdrop of the rapid evolution of infectious pathogens exhibiting antimicrobial resistance (“AMR”) and in particular, multiple-drug resistance (“MDR”)2. These two issues have created a major clinical and public health threat of global dimensions3 4 5.

The idea that AMR can be delayed or even prevented by combining drugs with different targets as so-called “free” combinationsi or “fixed-dose” combinationsii has been the subject of continuing interest (see Section 3). The underlying pharmacological theories as to why combination therapies should delay or prevent clinical resistance are intellectually satisfying6 but not rigorously proven in the field. Outside of some work in tuberculosis (“TB”)7 and malaria8 9, little attention has been given to identifying obstacles to the promotion, availability, and rational use of FDCs in the context of AMR.

i Simultaneous dosing of more than one drug contained in several different tablets or pills.

ii Simultaneous dosing of more than one drug contained in a single formulation, in which each drug has an independent mode of action, or the combination of which are synergistic or additive or complementary in their effect.


In this paper, we briefly summarize the biological basis for clinical antimicrobial resistance in TB, malaria and HIV/AIDS (Section 2) and review the pharmacotherapeutic reasons for using combination drugs to eliminate or slow development of AMR (Section 3). In particular, in Section 4 we summarize the available information regarding two hypotheses:

1) use of FDCs will ameliorate or inhibit clinical resistance to TB, HIV/AIDs and malaria, and 2) use of separate dispensing and/or co/blistering is equally as effective as FDCs in ameliorating or inhibiting this clinical resistance.


We then attempt to identify future research needs.

to previous section to next section
 

Last updated: May 3, 2013