WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter 2003, No. 04
(2003; 13 pages) View the PDF document
Table of Contents
Open this folder and view contentsREGULATORY MATTERS
Close this folderSAFETY OF MEDICINES
View the documentATYPICAL ANTI-PSYCHOTICS - Reports of hypertension
View the documentBOTULINUM A - Patients misled over safety
View the documentCHELIDONIUM MAJUS - Statement to advise use under supervision
View the documentCYCLO-OXYGENASE (COX)-2 INHIBITORS - Reports of hepatotoxicity
View the documentETONOGESTREL - Vaginal bleeding with sub-dermal implant
View the documentFLUTICASONE - ADR update
View the documentGATIFLOXACIN - Reports of abnormal glucose metabolism
View the documentHORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY (HRT) - ‘Million Women Study’ confirms breast cancer association
View the documentMEDROXY-PROGESTERONE - Reports of contraception failure with depot preparations
View the documentMEFLOQUINE - Patient guide warns of psychiatric adverse events
View the documentMETHOTREXATE - New solutions to prevent fatalities/adverse events
View the documentMINOCYCLINE - Hepatic reactions
View the documentPIPERACILLIN - Serum methotrexate monitoring advised during concomitant therapy
View the documentRIFAMPICIN & PYRAZINAMIDE - Warning against use in latent tuberculosis
View the documentSELECTIVE SEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITORS (SSRIs): Reports of hyponatraemia
View the documentSIBUTRAMINE - Serotonin syndrome
View the documentTICLOPIDINE - No decrease in ADR reports
View the documentVIGA/VIGA FOR WOMEN - Presence of sildenafil
View the documentWARFARIN & MICONAZOLE - Reminder about interaction
Open this folder and view contentsDRUGS IN THE NEWS
 

BOTULINUM A - Patients misled over safety

USA. The US FDA has raised objections that the web advertising or the product information in print for botulinum A toxin preparation (Botox) as posted by the company (Allergan) has insufficient information on the unwanted side effects that could result in patients treated with the product for cosmetic purposes. FDA is of the opinion that the advertisements pertaining to the product are false and misleading because they falsely identify the product as a cosmetic treatment, fail to reveal material facts about the product use and minimise the risk information presented. The advertising does not make it clear that more than four in ten people treated with the product suffer some form of side effect. The most common side effects of the treatment are headache and nausea; the product has also been linked with respiratory infection and ‘flu syndrome’, as well as temporary drooping of the eyelids.

Reference:

News & Updates, 27 Jun 2003. Available from URL: http://www.druginfozone.nhs.uk

to previous section to next section
 

Last updated: May 3, 2013