Protection and Promotion of Traditional Medicine - Implications for Public Health in Developing Countries
(2002; 131 pages) View the PDF document
Table of Contents
View the documentThe South Centre
View the documentPREFACE
View the documentINTRODUCTION
Open this folder and view contentsI. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND TRM
Open this folder and view contentsII. RATIONALE FOR PROTECTION
Open this folder and view contentsIII. APPLYING EXISTING IPRS
Close this folderIV. POLICY OPTIONS: PROTECTING AND PROMOTING TRM
View the documentA. Defining Public Domain
View the documentB. Title
Open this folder and view contentsC. Applying Patent Laws
View the documentD. Utility Models
View the documentE. Designing a sui generis Regime
View the documentF. Enforcement
View the documentG. Misappropriation Regime
View the documentH. Investment Incentives
View the documentI. Benefit Sharing
View the documentJ. Customary law
View the documentV. IPRs AND PUBLIC HEALTH
View the documentVI. CONCLUSIONS
View the documentREFERENCES
 

IV. POLICY OPTIONS: PROTECTING AND PROMOTING TRM

The previous sections have indicated different objectives and the scope available for the protection of TRM under IPRs. This section discusses some of the problems to be faced in order to implement different forms of IPRs-based protection. Such problems include - but are not limited to - the boundaries of the public domain, the attribution of rights, and enforcement issues. This section also discusses a number of policy options relating to the IPRs protection of TRM.

It must be acknowledged from the outset that the vast literature available on this subject exhibits a great variety of opinions on the desirability of extending IPRs protection to traditional knowledge, ranging from rejection of such possibility as inappropriate or likely to distort, rather than support, indigenous systems, to the belief that IPRs may benefit both knowledge holders and the society as a whole.131 These different views arise from multiple philosophical, legal and ethical perceptions of the status of such knowledge and the role of local/indigenous communities, as well as from diverging opinions and expectations as to the socio-economic implications of IPRs protection. The discussion that follows is essentially underpinned by concerns about the possible implications of IPRs in the area of public health.

131 See, e.g. Blakeney, 2000.

 

to previous section
to next section
 
 
The WHO Essential Medicines and Health Products Information Portal was designed and is maintained by Human Info NGO. Last updated: November 5, 2014