(2003; 211 pages)
1. Renders C, Valk G, Griffin S. Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary care, outpatient and community settings. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2001.
2. Norris SLL et al. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care, 2002, 25: 1159-1171.
3. Gozzoli V et al. Economic and clinical impact of alternative disease management strategies for secondary prevention in type 2 diabetes in the Swiss setting. Swiss Medical Weekly, 2001, 131: 303-310.
4. Aubert RE et al. Nurse case management to improve glycemic control in diabetic patients in a health maintenance organization. A randomized, controlled trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1998, 129: 605-612.
5. Piette JD et al. Do automated calls with nurse follow-up improve self-care and glycemic control among vulnerable patients with diabetes? American Journal of Medicine, 2000, 108: 20-27.
6. Weinberger M et al. A nurse-coordinated intervention for primary care patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: impact on glycemic control and health-related quality of life. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1995, 10: 59-66.
7. McCulloch DK et al. Improvement in diabetes care using an integrated population- based approach in a primary care setting. Disease Management, 2000, 3: 75-82.
8. Sadur CN et al. Diabetes management in a health maintenance organization. Efficacy of care management using cluster visits. Diabetes Care, 1999, 22: 2011-2017.
9. McCulloch DK et al. A population-based approach to diabetes management in a primary care setting: Early results and lessons learned. Effective Clinical Practice, 1998, 1: 12-22.
10. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2002, 288: 1909-1914.
11. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2002, 288: 1775-1779.
12. Wagner EH et al. Effect of improved glycemic control on health care costs and utilization. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2001, 285: 182-189.
13. Newell SA, Bowman JA, Cockburn JD. Can compliance with nonpharmacologic treatments for cardiovascular disease be improved?. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2000, 18: 253-261.
14. Monane M et al. The effects of initial drug choice and comorbidity on antihypertensive therapy compliance. Results from a population-based study in the elderly. American Journal of Hypertension, 1997, 10: 697-704.
15. Bloom BS. Continuation of initial antihypertensive medication after 1 year of therapy. Clinical Therapeutics, 1998, 20: 671-681.
16. Hasford JM. A population-based European cohort study of persistence in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. Journal of Human Hypertension, 2002, 16: 569-575.
17. Morisky DE et al. Five-year blood pressure control and mortality following health education for hypertensive patients. American Journal of Public Health, 1983, 73: 153-162
18. Kotchen JM et al. Impact of a rural high blood pressure control program on hypertension control and cardiovascular disease mortality. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1986, 255: 2177-2182.
19. Edmonds D et al. Does self-measurement of blood pressure improve patient compliance in hypertension? Journal of Hypertension, 1985, (Suppl) 3: S31- S34.
20. Stason WB et al. Effectiveness and costs of veterans affairs hypertension clinics. Medical Care, 1994, 32: 1197-1215.
21. Steptoe A et al. Behavioural counselling in general practice for the promotion of healthy behaviour among adults at increased risk of coronary heart disease: randomised trial. British Medical Journal, 1999, 319: 943-947.
22. Richardson R et al. Learning curve. Hypertension: catch them when they're older. Nursing Times, 2000, 96: 42-43.
23. Bogden PE et al. Comparing standard care with a physician and pharmacist team approach for uncontrolled hypertension. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1998, 13: 740-745.
24. Gibson PG et al. Limited (information only) patient education programs for adults with asthma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2002.
25. Taggart VS et al. You can control asthma: evaluation of an asthma education program for hospitalized inner-city children. Patient Education & Counseling, 1991, 17: 35-47.
26. Sommaruga M et al. The effects of a cognitive behavioural intervention in asthmatic patients. Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease, 1995, 50: 398-402.
27. Liljas B, Lahdensuo A. Is asthma self-management cost-effective? Patient Education & Counseling, 1997, 32: S97-S104.
28. Clark NM et al. The impact of health education on frequency and cost of health care use by low income children with asthma. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, 1986, 78: 108-115.
29. Neri M et al. Economic analysis of two structured treatment and teaching programs on asthma. Allergy, 1996, 51: 313-319.
30. Bolton MB et al. The cost and effectiveness of an education program for adults who have asthma. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1991, 6: 401-407.
31. Trautner C, Richter B, Berger M. Cost-effectiveness of a structured treatment and teaching programme on asthma. European Respiratory Journal, 1993, 6: 1485-1491.
32. Kotses H et al. A self-management program for adult asthma. Part I: Development and evaluation. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, 1995, 95: 529-540.
33. Taitel MS et al. A self-management program for adult asthma. Part II: Cost-benefit analysis. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, 1995, 95: 672-676.
34. Greineder DK, Loane KC, Parks P. Reduction in resource utilization by an asthma outreach program. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1995, 149: 415-420.
35. Wilson SR et al. Education of parents of infants and very young children with asthma: a developmental evaluation of the Wee Wheezers program. Journal of Asthma, 1996, 33: 239-254 [erratum published in Journal of Asthma, 1997, 34: 261].