Effective Drug Regulation - A Multicountry Study and Annex 1: Guide for Data Collection to Assess Drug Regulatory Performance
(2002; 187 pages) View the PDF document
Table of Contents
View the documentACRONYMS
View the documentPREFACE
View the documentACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
View the documentEXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Open this folder and view contents1. DRUG REGULATION: OBJECTIVES AND ISSUES
Open this folder and view contents2. MULTICOUNTRY STUDY ON EFFECTIVE DRUG REGULATION
Open this folder and view contents3. PROFILE OF THE COUNTRIES
Close this folder4. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
View the document4.1 MISSIONS AND GOALS OF DRUG REGULATION
View the document4.2 DOMAINS OF CONTROL
View the document4.3 OTHER NON-REGULATORY PHARMACEUTICAL FUNCTIONS
View the document4.4 NATIONAL DRUG POLICY
View the document4.5 HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF DRUG REGULATION
Open this folder and view contents5. REGULATORY CAPACITY
Open this folder and view contents6. LICENSING OF MANUFACTURING, DISTRIBUTION AND RETAIL SALE
Open this folder and view contents7. INSPECTION AND SURVEILLANCE
Open this folder and view contents8. PRODUCT ASSESSMENT AND REGISTRATION
Open this folder and view contents9. CONTROL OF DRUG PROMOTION AND ADVERTISING
Open this folder and view contents10. DRUG QUALITY CONTROL LABORATORY
Open this folder and view contents11. ASSESSING REGULATORY PERFORMANCE
Open this folder and view contents12. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EFFECTIVE DRUG REGULATION
Open this folder and view contentsANNEX 1: GUIDE FOR DATA COLLECTION TO ASSESS DRUG REGULATORY PERFORMANCE
 

4.1 MISSIONS AND GOALS OF DRUG REGULATION

The government’s stated missions and goals form the rationale for its decisions to intervene in selected societal activities. It must therefore define the objectives of drug regulation. The majority of the countries under review stated “ensuring the safety, efficacy and quality of drugs available to the population” to be the main goal of government drug regulatory actions. Australia and Malaysia spell out their drug regulatory missions and objectives in terms of the government’s role of controlling functions related to medicines. The governments of both countries seek to ensure the safety, efficacy and quality of drugs. Certain countries articulate additional objectives for regulation. Cyprus has an added element related to price. For Zimbabwe, “sustainable cost” is one of the goals of regulation. The mission of the National Drug Authority (NDA) of Uganda is even broader.

Box 1

Missions of drug regulatory authorities of selected countries

Australia

"To develop and implement appropriate national policies and control for medicines, medical devices, chemicals and radiation." TGA Corporate Plan 1997/98-1999/2000

Cyprus

"Safeguarding the public health and interests by requiring the availability of safe, effective, good quality drugs that are rationally priced." Law No. 30 of 1980.

Malaysia

"The National Pharmaceutical Control Bureau shall ensure the quality and safety of pharmaceutical products through the implementation of the relevant legislation by a competent workforce working together in strategic alliance towards improving the health of the people."

Uganda

"To ensure availability at all times of essential, efficacious and cost effective drugs to the entire Ugandan population." National Drug Policy and Authority Statute, 1993.

Zimbabwe

"Ensuring the achievement of quality health services delivery to the public in a safe, accessible and effective manner through the control of the manufacture, distribution, storage, and dispensing of both human and animal medicines throughout Zimbabwe at a sustainable cost." Corporate Strategy and Plan 1999-2001.

to previous section to next section
 

Last updated: May 3, 2013