Effective Drug Regulation - A Multicountry Study and Annex 1: Guide for Data Collection to Assess Drug Regulatory Performance
(2002; 187 pages) View the PDF document
Table of Contents
View the documentACRONYMS
View the documentPREFACE
View the documentACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
View the documentEXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Close this folder1. DRUG REGULATION: OBJECTIVES AND ISSUES
View the document1.1 DRUGS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
View the document1.2 CONTROLLING PRIVATE BEHAVIOUR FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES
View the document1.3 OBJECTIVES AND ORGANIZATION OF THIS REPORT
Open this folder and view contents2. MULTICOUNTRY STUDY ON EFFECTIVE DRUG REGULATION
Open this folder and view contents3. PROFILE OF THE COUNTRIES
Open this folder and view contents4. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Open this folder and view contents5. REGULATORY CAPACITY
Open this folder and view contents6. LICENSING OF MANUFACTURING, DISTRIBUTION AND RETAIL SALE
Open this folder and view contents7. INSPECTION AND SURVEILLANCE
Open this folder and view contents8. PRODUCT ASSESSMENT AND REGISTRATION
Open this folder and view contents9. CONTROL OF DRUG PROMOTION AND ADVERTISING
Open this folder and view contents10. DRUG QUALITY CONTROL LABORATORY
Open this folder and view contents11. ASSESSING REGULATORY PERFORMANCE
Open this folder and view contents12. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EFFECTIVE DRUG REGULATION
Open this folder and view contentsANNEX 1: GUIDE FOR DATA COLLECTION TO ASSESS DRUG REGULATORY PERFORMANCE
 

1.3 OBJECTIVES AND ORGANIZATION OF THIS REPORT

The aim of this report is to compare, contrast and synthesize country experience in drug regulation on the basis of data collected in 1998-1999 in the 10 countries which participated in the WHO multicountry study on effective drug regulation.

While data collected about drug regulation at a fixed point in time are static, drug regulation itself is highly dynamic. Drug regulatory functions are performed in response to a changing environment. This means that the current drug regulation systems in some participating countries may now differ from the system in operation at the time of data collection.

This work does not aim to rank the countries under study against any criteria. Rather, its purpose is to synthesize their experiences and draw generic conclusions from which other countries may learn.

This work does not intend to prescribe ready-made strategies for drug regulation. Instead, it has broader aims, namely to:

• provide simple conceptual frameworks to enhance understanding of the fundamentals of drug regulation, which policy-makers may use in designing drug regulatory systems

• present key features of drug regulatory systems in different countries

• propose drug regulation strategies on the basis of country experiences and the comparative analyses.

Chapter 2 describes the background of the WHO multicountry study, methods of data collection and comparative analysis. Chapter 3 provides a brief profile of each of the countries under study, and compares a number of background features relevant to drug regulation. Conceptual frameworks to be used in the analysis and synthesis of overall drug regulation in subsequent chapters are presented in Chapter 4. In Chapter 5, the authority, capacity and organization of drug regulatory agencies are discussed. Chapters 6-10 address the main drug regulatory functions. Each of these chapters contains parallel sections covering power, process, personnel, financing, regulatory functions and planning and performance. Chapter 11 sets out concepts, methods and indicators for assessing regulatory performance and discusses the performance of the 10 countries in relation to various aspects of regulation. In Chapter 12, key lessons are presented and strategies for improving drug regulation are proposed.

 

to previous section to next section
 

Last updated: January 19, 2012