Effective Drug Regulation - A Multicountry Study and Annex 1: Guide for Data Collection to Assess Drug Regulatory Performance
(2002; 187 pages) View the PDF document
Table of Contents
View the documentACRONYMS
View the documentPREFACE
View the documentACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
View the documentEXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Open this folder and view contents1. DRUG REGULATION: OBJECTIVES AND ISSUES
Open this folder and view contents2. MULTICOUNTRY STUDY ON EFFECTIVE DRUG REGULATION
Open this folder and view contents3. PROFILE OF THE COUNTRIES
Open this folder and view contents4. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Open this folder and view contents5. REGULATORY CAPACITY
Open this folder and view contents6. LICENSING OF MANUFACTURING, DISTRIBUTION AND RETAIL SALE
Open this folder and view contents7. INSPECTION AND SURVEILLANCE
Close this folder8. PRODUCT ASSESSMENT AND REGISTRATION
View the document8.1 POWER AND PROCESS
View the document8.2 HUMAN RESOURCES
View the document8.3 PAYING FOR REGISTRATION
View the document8.4 PERFORMANCE
View the document8.5 ADVERSE DRUG REACTION MONITORING
View the document8.6 CLINICAL TRIALS
Open this folder and view contents9. CONTROL OF DRUG PROMOTION AND ADVERTISING
Open this folder and view contents10. DRUG QUALITY CONTROL LABORATORY
Open this folder and view contents11. ASSESSING REGULATORY PERFORMANCE
Open this folder and view contents12. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EFFECTIVE DRUG REGULATION
Open this folder and view contentsANNEX 1: GUIDE FOR DATA COLLECTION TO ASSESS DRUG REGULATORY PERFORMANCE
 

8.6 CLINICAL TRIALS

8.6.1 Clinical trials regulation at work

The conduct of clinical trials is regulated in all the countries, except Cyprus. In Cyprus, the policy of the Ministry of Health is not to permit clinical trials for experimental medical products. Multicountry clinical trials for products licensed in developed countries are undertaken in some institutions and regulated by ethics committees (Table 8.5). In these countries, approval of clinical trials is carried out either by the DRA, as in Estonia, Malaysia, Tunisia, Venezuela and Zimbabwe, or by ethics committees. When the DRA itself is responsible for control, information about the trials is processed centrally. In Tunisia, clinical trials form part of the registration process. Trials are requested, when deemed necessary, by the specialized committee charged with reviewing the new drug. The trial proposal is then evaluated by the technical committee, and forwarded to the Health Minister for final approval. Cuba has a National Centre for the Coordination of Clinical Trials under the Ministry of Health, which performs clinical trials on drugs produced within the country.

Regulation of clinical trials through use of a specialized ethics committee at the trial site constitutes a decentralized approach. This approach is used in the Netherlands, where a local medical ethics committee at the site of the trial is responsible for the evaluation.

In Australia, approval of clinical trials involves both the regulatory authority and an ethics committee. Under the Clinical Trial Exemption (CTX) scheme, a clinical trial proposal must first be evaluated by the TGA, and then approved by an ethics committee on-site. Under the Clinical Trial Notification (CTN) scheme, a trial is evaluated and approved by the local ethics committee, and then notified to the TGA.

Differences in the systems used to regulate clinical trials in Australia and the Netherlands illustrate how the delegation of authority affects the ability of the central agency to monitor the working of the entire system. In Australia, all approved clinical trials must be notified to the TGA. There is no such reporting requirement for the MEB in the Netherlands. Information about the number and details of clinical trials conducted in the Netherlands is therefore not readily available to the MEB.

The majority of these countries have guidelines for evaluating clinical trial proposals. All of them are consistent with the Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (the Helsinki Declaration) and also conform to the WHO Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice for trials on pharmaceutical products. This reflects the general trend towards harmonization of standards and norms in technical areas, as well as in drug regulation, as discussed in Chapter 4.

8.6.2 Performance

Quantitative data indicate a general increase in the number of clinical trial applications in Australia, Cuba, Estonia, Malaysia and Venezuela for the period 1994-97. Figure 8.11 shows the four-year average number of clinical trial applications received by the relevant authorities in these countries. During this period, the number of clinical trial applications in Australia far exceeded those received in all the other countries combined. The same is also true when the number of applications is computed against the number of new drug applications (Figure 8.12).

Table 8.5 Control of clinical trials

 

Australia

Cuba

Cyprus

Estonia

Malaysia

Netherlands

Tunisia

Uganda

Venezuela

Zimbabwe

Control of clinical trials

*

Approving body

Local ethics committees**

DRA

N/A

DRA & regional ethics committees

DRA

Local medical ethics committees***

Specialized commission but approved by Min of Health

NDA

INH

As part of MCAZ

Guidelines

N/A

Yes, procedures of committee of medical ethics for clinical trials

Yes, set up by the Research Committee of the Ministry of Health

Yes, norms and regulation of research in clinical pharmacology

No, applications are sent to external experts for evaluation

Consistency of guidelines with:
a) Helsinki Declarationa

N/A

-

b) WHO guidelinesb

N/A

-

• = Yes = No - = data or information not available N/A = Not applicable

* Clinical trials are not allowed in the country.

** All clinical trials must be notified to the Therapeutic Goods Administration.

*** Notification or approval by the drug regulatory authority not required.

a Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects.

b WHO Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice for trials on pharmaceutical products.


Figure 8.11 Average number of clinical trials, four-year average*

* No data available for Cyprus and the Netherlands


Figure 8.12 Number of clinical trials requested per new drug application*

* No data available for Cyprus, the Netherlands or Uganda.

 

to previous section to next section
 

Last updated: May 3, 2013