Marketing Authorization of Pharmaceutical Products with Special Reference to Multisource (Generic) Products: A Manual for Drug Regulatory Authorities - Regulatory Support Series No. 005
(1998; 213 pages)
Table of Contents
View the documentPREFACE
View the documentI. INTRODUCTION
Open this folder and view contentsII. PROVISIONS AND PREREQUISITES FOR REGULATORY CONTROL
Open this folder and view contentsIII. OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Close this folderIV. REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS FOR MARKETING AUTHORIZATION OF MULTISOURCE (GENERIC) PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS
View the documentA. Applicability
View the documentB. Initial decisions on options for premarket evaluation
View the documentC. Evaluation of data on quality
View the documentD. Quality of starting materials
View the documentE. Container labelling
View the documentF. Toxicological, pharmacological and clinical data
View the documentG. Product Information
View the documentH. Interchangeability
View the documentV. ISSUE OF WRITTEN MARKETING AUTHORIZATION
View the documentVI. VARIATIONS
View the documentVII. PERIODIC REVIEWS
View the documentVIII. SUSPENSION AND REVOCATION OF MARKETING AUTHORIZATION
View the documentGLOSSARY
View the documentABBREVIATIONS
View the documentREFERENCES
Open this folder and view contentsANNEXES
 

H. Interchangeability

New multisource (generic) pharmaceutical products must be of good quality and at least as safe and efficacious as existing products. The need for interchangeability arises when a patient may change from one brand to another, for example in these circumstances:

X Physicians prescribe by generic name;

X Generic substitution is permitted by national legislation;

X The same brand is not always available, for example in remote areas of the country;

X Patients in hospitals are given whatever brand the hospital has in stock, and sometimes different brands on different occasions;

X Patients receive a different brand after discharge from hospital.

WHO’s guidelines on “Multisource (generic) pharmaceutical products” mentions a number of features which are important to interchangeability (see Annex 3, Part one, section 2), and each of these is examined in Annex 7. The science behind demonstrating interchangeability is still evolving; an example is the current debate in the literature on the relevance of “intestinal permeability” (12) and how to measure it.

By their nature, different brands of modified (sustained, continuous, prolonged, slow) release products are more likely not to be equivalent than are different brands of immediate, conventional release products. Some DRAs take the view that such products should never be considered interchangeable, while others define a series of studies that should be conducted, including in some circumstances comparative clinical trials. For delayed release products, such as enteric-coated tablets, interchangeability is more readily demonstrated.

 

to previous section to next section
 

Last updated: April 24, 2012