Marketing Authorization of Pharmaceutical Products with Special Reference to Multisource (Generic) Products: A Manual for Drug Regulatory Authorities - Regulatory Support Series No. 005
(1998; 213 pages)
Table of Contents
View the documentPREFACE
View the documentI. INTRODUCTION
Open this folder and view contentsII. PROVISIONS AND PREREQUISITES FOR REGULATORY CONTROL
Close this folderIII. OPERATING ACTIVITIES
View the documentA. Transparency
View the documentB. Policies
View the documentC. Administrative procedures
View the documentD. Guidelines for applicants
View the documentE. Model application form
View the documentF. Communication among departments within the DRA
View the documentG. Relationship of evaluators with GMP inspectors
View the documentH. Relationship of evaluators with the quality control laboratories
View the documentI. Functional relationship of the evaluators with the expert advisory body
View the documentJ. Relationship of evaluators with the pharmaceutical industry and confidentiality of data
View the documentK. Meetings with applicants
View the documentL. Procedures for appeals
View the documentM. Collaboration with other DRAs
View the documentN. Collaboration with WHO
View the documentO. Use of external experts as evaluators
View the documentP. Timeframes for processing of applications
View the documentQ. Publication of marketing authorization decisions
Open this folder and view contentsIV. REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS FOR MARKETING AUTHORIZATION OF MULTISOURCE (GENERIC) PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS
View the documentV. ISSUE OF WRITTEN MARKETING AUTHORIZATION
View the documentVI. VARIATIONS
View the documentVII. PERIODIC REVIEWS
View the documentVIII. SUSPENSION AND REVOCATION OF MARKETING AUTHORIZATION
View the documentGLOSSARY
View the documentABBREVIATIONS
View the documentREFERENCES
Open this folder and view contentsANNEXES
 

A. Transparency

Transparency means (1) defining policies and procedures in print and publishing the printed documentation, and (2) giving reasons for decisions to the party concerned. DRAs should adopt a policy of transparency because it is the simplest and most efficient way of conducting business. While the circulation of some documentation may need to be restricted, for example during policy development, the majority of finalized written documents (and particularly those concerning policy and administration) should be made available to DRA staff, the pharmaceutical industry, the parliament and the general public. DRAs with limited resources may achieve cost savings by posting their guidelines on the Internet. Transparency has these advantages:

• Applicants and the DRA do not spend time trying to clarify each other’s policies and attitudes.

• Staff within the DRA do not spend time determining what their own agency’s policies are (“reinventing the wheel”).

• Communication at all levels is facilitated if each party understands the other’s starting point for discussions.

• Terminology is defined in policy documents so that the parties use the same terms to mean the same thing.

Transparency also means giving reasons for decisions. For example, letters rejecting applications should include reasons for the decision.

to previous section to next section
 

Last updated: May 3, 2013