Marketing Authorization of Pharmaceutical Products with Special Reference to Multisource (Generic) Products: A Manual for Drug Regulatory Authorities - Regulatory Support Series No. 005
(1998; 213 pages)
Table of Contents
View the documentPREFACE
View the documentI. INTRODUCTION
Open this folder and view contentsII. PROVISIONS AND PREREQUISITES FOR REGULATORY CONTROL
Close this folderIII. OPERATING ACTIVITIES
View the documentA. Transparency
View the documentB. Policies
View the documentC. Administrative procedures
View the documentD. Guidelines for applicants
View the documentE. Model application form
View the documentF. Communication among departments within the DRA
View the documentG. Relationship of evaluators with GMP inspectors
View the documentH. Relationship of evaluators with the quality control laboratories
View the documentI. Functional relationship of the evaluators with the expert advisory body
View the documentJ. Relationship of evaluators with the pharmaceutical industry and confidentiality of data
View the documentK. Meetings with applicants
View the documentL. Procedures for appeals
View the documentM. Collaboration with other DRAs
View the documentN. Collaboration with WHO
View the documentO. Use of external experts as evaluators
View the documentP. Timeframes for processing of applications
View the documentQ. Publication of marketing authorization decisions
Open this folder and view contentsIV. REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS FOR MARKETING AUTHORIZATION OF MULTISOURCE (GENERIC) PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS
View the documentV. ISSUE OF WRITTEN MARKETING AUTHORIZATION
View the documentVI. VARIATIONS
View the documentVII. PERIODIC REVIEWS
View the documentVIII. SUSPENSION AND REVOCATION OF MARKETING AUTHORIZATION
View the documentGLOSSARY
View the documentABBREVIATIONS
View the documentREFERENCES
Open this folder and view contentsANNEXES
 

H. Relationship of evaluators with the quality control laboratories

Quality control laboratory testing should be available as a part of the premarket evaluation process. It is essential that a sample be tested if the DRA has been unable, for whatever reason, to conduct a full evaluation itself. Quality control laboratory testing should also be available in cases where the evaluator has reason to question the information provided, for example to check whether an assay method will in fact work.

The sample subjected to testing should comply in all respects with the information submitted for premarket evaluation, including formulation, method and site of manufacture, quality control, and so on.

If there is no national quality control laboratory, or if the country in question lacks the facilities to test the product (e.g. because special equipment is required), contract testing by another DRA or by WHO interregional or regional laboratories is acceptable. Where national quality control laboratories do exist, operational links with peripheral laboratories (both public and private) can enhance geographical coverage.

Quality control laboratory testing of products that are already marketed, followed up by strong action when quality is found to be poor, encourages manufacturers to maintain product quality.

to previous section to next section
 

Last updated: January 19, 2012