Marketing Authorization of Pharmaceutical Products with Special Reference to Multisource (Generic) Products: A Manual for Drug Regulatory Authorities - Regulatory Support Series No. 005
(1998; 213 pages)
Table of Contents
View the documentPREFACE
View the documentI. INTRODUCTION
Open this folder and view contentsII. PROVISIONS AND PREREQUISITES FOR REGULATORY CONTROL
Close this folderIII. OPERATING ACTIVITIES
View the documentA. Transparency
View the documentB. Policies
View the documentC. Administrative procedures
View the documentD. Guidelines for applicants
View the documentE. Model application form
View the documentF. Communication among departments within the DRA
View the documentG. Relationship of evaluators with GMP inspectors
View the documentH. Relationship of evaluators with the quality control laboratories
View the documentI. Functional relationship of the evaluators with the expert advisory body
View the documentJ. Relationship of evaluators with the pharmaceutical industry and confidentiality of data
View the documentK. Meetings with applicants
View the documentL. Procedures for appeals
View the documentM. Collaboration with other DRAs
View the documentN. Collaboration with WHO
View the documentO. Use of external experts as evaluators
View the documentP. Timeframes for processing of applications
View the documentQ. Publication of marketing authorization decisions
Open this folder and view contentsIV. REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS FOR MARKETING AUTHORIZATION OF MULTISOURCE (GENERIC) PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS
View the documentV. ISSUE OF WRITTEN MARKETING AUTHORIZATION
View the documentVI. VARIATIONS
View the documentVII. PERIODIC REVIEWS
View the documentVIII. SUSPENSION AND REVOCATION OF MARKETING AUTHORIZATION
View the documentGLOSSARY
View the documentABBREVIATIONS
View the documentREFERENCES
Open this folder and view contentsANNEXES
 

D. Guidelines for applicants

In keeping with a policy of transparency, the DRA should publish guidelines on the data to be provided with the different types of applications. It is not necessary to write a completely new guideline when several such documents exist worldwide. The simplest approach is to adopt the content and format of an already existing guideline, such as that of Canada, the European Union (EU), Japan, South Africa, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) (see box) with, if necessary, modifications to accommodate the local situation. More than one guideline can be adopted, in which case applications may follow either guideline. It will often be appropriate to add technical requirements appropriate to local circumstances, such as requirements for higher temperature and/or humidity data to reflect the climate, or for interchangeability. WHO guidelines are available on most of the technical requirements for multisource pharmaceutical products.

Harmonization of technical guidelines is a desirable goal for following reasons:

X Companies have to generate only one data set for all regions, and consequently the amount of human and animal experimentation is reduced;

X The cost of development of new drugs is reduced, which ought to lead to lower price;

X Local products are more likely to be acceptable for export to other countries.

Some additional experimentation may be necessary for local purposes. For example:

X Studies on interchangeability with locally available products;

X Stability studies under conditions of high temperature and/or humidity (see Annex 11) to verify local applicability;

X Clinical and/or toxicological studies in support of use in endemic diseases;

X Special studies in ethnic groups.

Such studies may be conducted in another country provided that they directly address the local issues and are of a good scientific standard.

ICH (the International Conference on Harmonisation) is an initiative supported by regulatory and industry associations from the three major economic areas of the world, namely the USA, the European Union and Japan. Other parties, such as WHO and the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), are observers. ICH produces guidelines on data requirements for marketing authorization of new chemical entities and biologicals for use in the member regions of ICH. These guidelines are sometimes adopted by other countries for reasons of harmonization.
Other regional groupings are in the process of building up similarly harmonized guidelines, including the Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the Convenio Hipólito Unanue (an agreement between a group of South American nations).

The guidelines on data to be submitted should be interpreted in a flexible manner. There may be means of establishing quality, safety and efficacy other than those in the guidelines. A general guideline may not be applicable to a particular product. Applicants should have the option of presenting data that are not in conformity with guidelines, but the onus is then on the applicant to demonstrate, by science and sound argument, that the alternative is acceptable. It is not the DRA’s responsibility to make the best of poor data. The DRA should be able to refuse applications which do not meet the guidelines if the case been argued is not sound.

It is usually appropriate to combine guidelines on technical data with those on administrative requirements in a single publication. Technical and administrative guidelines should be readily available on request by potential applicants. A fee may be charged, depending on government policy.

to previous section to next section
 

Last updated: January 19, 2012